Re: Record Clubs
Beaver Fever <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Feb 2024 23:37:47 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.cecil-adams |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, January 23, 1997 at 12:00:00=E2=80=AFAM UTC-8, Amituo wrote: > Why do record companies run "record clubs," those things you see > advertised in magazines and Sunday-paper pullouts? Aren't they just > undercutting their own profits? Some people seem to think that the offere= d > titles are excess stock, but I don't think that this is true as the CDs > (or tapes, or LPs back in the day) don't have barcodes, and I believe tha= t > they have different catalog numbers. I don't think that the record compan= y > would print up new packaging for excess stock. > It seems that with a lot of these record clubs, you get 8 CDs for free, > with the obligation to buy one more. Granted, they have little overhead > for these, and the prices are likely to be a bit higher than the local > music store, but even so, it doesn't seem to add up. Especially since > stores buy CDs at about $9 wholesale. (Again, granted, they get them from > a distributor....) Selling retail seems like it'd be much more profitable > than printing up different versions of products and then selling them at > reduced cost. > Maybe someone has a better idea of what the numbers are in this equation, > and what the motives are? I miss them, they were awesome. Still have all those cassettes.=20