Re: ??????????????Is it impossible to "get away with rape"???????????????
Erter Terte <[email protected]> Sun, 4 Feb 2024 07:38:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate,alt.fan.chad-bryant,alt.flame,alt.food.fast-food,alt.free.newsservers,alt.usenet.kooks,talk.politics.guns |
|---|---|
| Organization | theCubeNet - www.thecubenet.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 17:19:00 +0000, ??????????Jen?????????? > Dershmender ???????????????????? <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Cite applicable statutory and/or case law for the time the assault > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= is alleged to have occurred. If you're simply further expressing your > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= low intellect, you will offer avoidance. Or you will "run away" from > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= the request. > > > Your admission that you are simply further expressing your low > intellect is accepted, Jen. > > > > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Is it possible that someone could rape someone and not ever be charged > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= for it? > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Yes. > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= =?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= Would that make it "not rape"? > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= No. Sadly, you're so stump stupid, you will never understand. > >=?UTF-8?B?8J+Ps++4j+KAjfCfjIg=?= > > > >You just admitted that someone could have raped someone, not been charged with "rape" (thereby "getting away with rape"), but then sued for defamation for denying that a rape occurred and calling the person who was raped a liar. Preponderance of the facts shows that there was indeed enough evidence to convince a jury that there was indeed a rape/sexual assault. To say that there was "no rape" just because there was no rape trial, charges, or sentencing is outright "stump stupid", as you like to bark loudly. Some Logic 101 for you: Someone was raped => There was indeed, a rape. > > > > Please speak with a professional about your irrational fear of > your Enter key. > That aside, Trump wasn't convicted of rape. You can continue to > prove you're too stupid to understand if you need to. > > >We even have a guy here in AC who does that and you dolts act like it didn't ever happen in the history of the world. > > Does what? Get sued for defamation? > > > > >Are you having trouble accepting that Tr*mp is a rapist pussy-grabber just like he comes off as when he opens his mouth and says bigoted/racist/chauvinist/sexist shit? > > > ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_assault#:~:text=Outside%20of%20law%2C%20the%20term,used%20interchangeably%20with%20sexual%20assault.> > > > >Rape > >Main article: Rape > >Outside of law, the term rape (sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent) is often used interchangeably with sexual assault.[31][32] Although closely related, the two terms are technically distinct in most jurisdictions. Sexual assault typically includes rape and other forms of non-consensual sexual activity.[4][33] > > > > Again, we're discussing the law. As such, only legal definitions > can be used. But you're just too stupid to understand. A truth I'm > confident you will prove again. > > >[31] Roberts, Albert R.; Ann Wolbert Bergess; CHERYL REGEHR (2009). Victimology: Theories and Applications. Sudbury, Mass: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 228. ISBN 978-0-7637-7210-9. > >[32] Krantz, G.; Garcia-Moreno, C (2005). "Violence against women". Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 59 (10): 818?21. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.022756. PMC 1732916. PMID 16166351. > > > >HTH > > Ibid. > > https://postimg.cc/Bj0GdzVJ LOL