Re: AOC pushes Democratic Party to distance itself from 'Obama-era insiders' - "QUEER LOSERS"!

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:10:45 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<[email protected]> wrote:

>NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in 
>news:[email protected]:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:49:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>Vanishing Walz <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>news:[email protected]: 
>>>
>>>> On 11/27/2024 11:24 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> On 11/27/2024 10:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and 
>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "John Smyth" <[email protected]> wrote in message news: 
>>>>>>>> %[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken
>>>>>>>>>> Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to
>>>>>>>>>> death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:5qq%[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper
>>>>>>>>>>>> and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy,
>>>>>>>>>>>> lied: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to 
>be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for dismissal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charged. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media announsement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hush money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still fight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-
>to-d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elay-donald 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-
>AA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1unHTg 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his trial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the
>>>>>>>>>>>> judge's application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, really, scooter.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of
>>>>>>>>>>> for which he was performing a coverup of?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Asked and answered, scooter. You're running in circles, scooter.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>>>>>>>>> crimes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed
>>>>>>>>> crimes...because they didn't have to.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he
>>>>>>>> cover them up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get 
>>>>>>> someone else to commit them, scooter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court.
>>>>> That's a lie, scooter. The intent being established is *exactly why*
>>>>> the jury convicted Trump of 34 counts of violating §175.10 (felony)
>>>> 
>>>> The trial was rigged to discredit Trump and the whore who violated 
>the
>>>> NDA walked.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>
>>>So the judge, procecutors, defense lawyers, jurors and alternates, 
>media 
>>>coverage all conspired together to rig the trial?
>> 
>> Yeah pretty much (but not the defense lawyers).
>> 
>
>And your proof of this conspiracy is what?

The prosecution came up with the most ridiculous case that would never
stand in a real court and the judge permitted it over and over again.
If not an active conspiracy, it certainly is a huge passive one.