Re: AOC pushes Democratic Party to distance itself from 'Obama-era insiders' - "QUEER LOSERS"!

On 11/30/2024 7:56 AM, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:10:45 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> NoBody <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:49:26 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vanishing Walz <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/27/2024 11:24 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/27/2024 10:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> On 11/25/2024 8:57 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper and
>>>>>>>> gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "John Smyth" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:
>>>>>>>>> %[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2024 5:50 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:51:51 -0600, scooter, the drunken
>>>>>>>>>>> Virginia camper and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to
>>>>>>>>>>> death of Rudy, lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:5qq%[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/20/2024 8:31 AM, scooter, the drunken Virginia camper
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and gutless chickenshit who is frightened to death of Rudy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Baxter" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:vhl00m$5f6b$2@dont- email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 02:30:06 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Everybody knows those were "trumped-up" charges.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.  tRump's lawers are now asking for sentencing to
>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until after the Presidential term - they are NOT asking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for dismissal,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nor are they asking for a new trial -- they are imclicity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> acknowedging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the trial was entirely legitimate and tRump guilty as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Actually, it's the prosecuters who want the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sentencing delayed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you half-witted fool. Read it in the following far left
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> media announsement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Prosecutors advised a New York judge on Tuesday to delay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President-elect Donald Trump's criminal sentencing in his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hush money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case following the November election, but said they will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still fight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> against Trump's efforts to get the case dismissed."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/prosecutors-ask-
>> to-d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elay-donald
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -trump-hush-money-sentencing-but-oppose-case-dismissal/ar-
>> AA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1unHTg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's still a criminal.  It was a jury that convicted him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and his trial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completely Constitutional.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not if it was based on fabricated evidence and a false
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It wasn't, scooter. The evidence was rock-solid and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> judge's application of the law was impeccable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, really, scooter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The exactly WHAT specific crime did they find Trump guilty of
>>>>>>>>>>>> for which he was performing a coverup of?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Asked and answered, scooter. You're running in circles, scooter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They allowed the jury to select from mulitiple choice, unproven
>>>>>>>>>>> crimes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The jury didn't find Trump guilty of the concealed
>>>>>>>>>> crimes...because they didn't have to.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you can't show the crimes were committed then how could he
>>>>>>>>> cover them up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The law only requires that Trump *intended* to commit them or get
>>>>>>>> someone else to commit them, scooter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet.. no proof of such intent was ever established in court.
>>>>>> That's a lie, scooter. The intent being established is *exactly why*
>>>>>> the jury convicted Trump of 34 counts of violating §175.10 (felony)
>>>>>
>>>>> The trial was rigged to discredit Trump and the whore who violated
>> the
>>>>> NDA walked.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So the judge, procecutors, defense lawyers, jurors and alternates,
>> media
>>>> coverage all conspired together to rig the trial?
>>>
>>> Yeah pretty much (but not the defense lawyers).
>>>
>>
>> And your proof of this conspiracy is what?
> 
> The prosecution came up with the most ridiculous case

No, it wasn't. It was a very solid case and almost a slam dunk. The same charge, 
first degree falsification of business records (§175.10), has been successfully 
prosecuted many times in New York.

> that would never stand in a real court

The New York court where Trump was tried and convicted is a real and very 
ordinary New York court.

> and the judge permitted it over and over again.

He permitted it once, and that was all that was needed.

You are making shit up again.