Re: -- LATEST UPDATE ON ISRAEL / PALESTINIAN CONFLICT: BY WHICH TERM PARTEIGENOSSE OR COMRADE DO SOUTH AFRICANS PREFER TO REFERENCE THEIR CHRISTO-FASCIST POLITICAL MEMBERS?
dolf <[email protected]> Sun, 11 Feb 2024 16:59:22 +1100
| Newsgroups | alt.culture.south-africa,alt.fan.countries.ghana,alt.culture.african,soc.culture.nigeria,alt.politics.africa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 -
CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330):
*OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which
substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is
sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
like KANYE WEST."
SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
A typical sinner Christian."
DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
"MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ
(守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 =
#508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
Your reprobate response is irrational."
MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1607 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Have it your way."
EMAIL TO MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024:
"WHETHER THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST
SCHOOL OF THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
A consideration on whether there was a CULTURAL EXCHANGE between HAN
DYNASTY CHINESE DAOist school of thought / TORAH JUDAISM especially
given 104 BCE (ie. 103 if no zero year for 19 year metonic lunar cycle
or 293 x 365.2423 tropical year or 294 x 364 day / years) and the
consideration of ROMAN ERA political censure (a euphemism concerning the
crucifixion as convenient opposition elimination) conveys both obscured
and dispersed comments, such as for instance within the EPISTLE TO THE
ROMANS there is made a comment about indebtedness to the GREEKS and the
BARBARIANS [Romans 1:14] but that the ORACLES OF GOD [Romans 3:2] are a
special intellectual possession of the JEWS and yet by the MORAL
PROSCRIPTION on the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú) we're able to see
equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of any documented SEVEN day
cosmogony until later antiquity.
#608 as [#3, #200, #400, #5] = gûwr (H1481): {UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4} 1)
to sojourn, abide, dwell in, dwell with, remain, inhabit, be a stranger,
be continuing, surely; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SOJOURN*, *DWELL* *FOR* *A*
*TIME*; 1a2) to abide, stay, temporarily dwell; 1b) (Hithpolel); 1b1) to
seek hospitality with; 1b2) to assemble oneself; 1c) to stir up trouble,
strife, quarrel, gather together; 1c1) (Qal); i) to stir up strife; ii)
to quarrel; 1c2) (Hithpolel) to excite oneself; 1d) to dread, fear,
stand in awe, be afraid; 1d1) (Qal); i) to fear, be afraid; ii) to be in
awe, stand in awe;
#608 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #80, #10, #4, #8, #40, #70, #10, #200] =
parepídēmos (G3927): {UMBRA: #598 % #41 = #24} 1) *ONE* *WHO* *COMES*
*FROM* *A* *FOREIGN* *COUNTRY* *INTO* *A* *CITY* *OR* *LAND* *TO*
*RESIDE* *THERE* *BY* *THE* *SIDE* *OF* *THE* *NATIVES*; 2) a stranger;
3) sojourning in a strange place, a foreigner; 4) in the NT metaph. in
reference to heaven as the native country, one who sojourns on earth;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:608>
The common teleological notion #608 - *SILK* would appear to imply such,
but when did it first occur and was it recursive at diverse times over
centuries? The LUOSHU SQUARE is clearly a western philosophy
indebtedness to oriental thought and accordingly the BABYLONIAN "THE
GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH" ASSOCIATION is
then a question about viable FOUNDATIONS to the ROMAN STATE and its
WORLDVIEW (eg: RUSSIA only adopted the GREGORIAN CALENDAR upon 14
FEBRUARY 1918 pursuant to a Sovnarkom decree signed 24 JANUARY 1918
(Julian) by VLADIMIR LENIN) whether CATHOLIC, ISLAM or ORTHODOX being an
artifice of obmutescence concerning a seething iniquitous maleficence as
its only claim to an exquisite piety which has no association with ours.
The only undoubted explicit reference of silk within the Bible occurs in
[Revelation 18:12] where it is mentioned among the treasures of the
typical BABYLON.
#608 as [#200, #8, #100, #10, #20, #70, #200] = sērikós (G4596): {UMBRA:
#608 % #41 = #34} 1) made of silk; 2) *SILK*, i.e. the fabric, silken
garments;
According to accounts it is however, in the highest degree probable that
the texture was known to the Hebrews from the time that their commercial
relations were extended by KING SOLOMON (reigned: 970-930 BCE).
MICHAEL NYLAN (BERKELEY.EDU) @ 0803 HOURS ON 11 FEBRUARY 2024: "WHETHER
THERE WAS CULTURAL EXCHANGE BETWEEN HAN DYNASTY CHINESE DAOIST SCHOOL OF
THOUGHT / TORAH JUDAISM?
If you knew my work, you would know that there was no Daoist school of
thought in the Han.
That there may have been cross-cultural borrowings goes without saying.
But the direction of borrowing is not always clear, nor can such
borrowings be proven,
since many ideas are independently developed in different cultures."
If I may state this very politely but nonetheless with great clarity, it
is a matter of concern to myself that in having engaged within urgent
labour in relation to the NEW YORK TERRORIST ATTACK dated 11 SEPTEMBER
2001 concerning its being a TRIPARTITE v's BIPARTITE NUMBER META LOGIC
issue as the possibility of it having an impetus as systemic BIPARTITE
NUMBER foundation of ISLAMIC BELIEF being consequential a conformity
with REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942 which
specifically relates to “NEW YORK SKY-SCRAPERS: THEIR VULNERABILITY TO
AIR ATTACK” which a perusal of your academic research appears to convey
as conforming to COGITO #45 - GREATNESS (TA) - 𝌲大 = #496 / [#23, #55,
#54, #50, #35].
#568 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#2, #40, #90, #30, #6, #400] =
mᵉtsôwlâh (H4688): {UMBRA: #171 % #41 = #7} 1) *DEPTH*, the deep, the
deep sea;
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #303 - 28 AUGUST 1942: "The *DEPTH* of the
foundations of some sky-scrapers in New York is as much as seventy
metres, and the driving of the cement foundation demands a pressure of
six or eight thousand hundredweights. An air raid, such as those against
London, would have a devastating effect on New York. It would be
physically impossible to clear the débris, and it is not possible to
build air-raid shelters.” [page 669]

<https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/michael-nylan>
[MICHAEL NYLAN IS A PROFESSOR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY]
I quite accept your DISTINGUISHED scholarly opinion "IF YOU KNEW MY
WORK, YOU WOULD KNOW THAT THERE WAS NO DAOIST SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN THE
HAN" as punctilious #65 - INNER (NEI) - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY / [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] custodian (ie. THE UNAVOIDABLE
ANALOGY IS TO EITHER TO A *DUTIFUL* *CATHOLIC* *WIFE* *IN* *THE*
*KITCHEN* OR ONE WITH *POISON* *ON* *A* *COMFORT* *WOMAN'S* *LIPS* *IN*
*FÜHRERBUNKER* BENEATH THE REICH CHANCELLERY GARDEN AND AS TO WHETHER IT
INCLUDED ROSES REMAINS A FASCINATING PIECE OF ARCHITECTURAL AND
POLITICAL HISTORY OVER ANY CLANDESTINED CATHOLIC UBER ALLES MENTALITY
AND ANTI-SEMITISM) of early Chinese history from the fifth century BC to
the fifth century AD, with an emphasis on the sociopolitical context
such as myths and rituals, aesthetic theories and material culture,
belief: "No translation can ever hope to fully suggest the intricate
beauty of the original text by YANG HSIUNG. My hope is simply that this
study will revive interest in this important thinker. It is an
invitation to others to enter into the pleasures of HAN PHILOSOPHY.
[NYLAN, page xi]
YANG HSIUNG (53 B.C.A.D. 18) initially won fame under EMPEROR CH'ENG
(r. 33-7 B.C.) for long prose-poems (fu) whose satirical content was
cloaked in lush imagery, hyperbole, and allusion. By the reign of
EMPEROR AI (r. 71 B.C.), however, YANG HSIUNG had redirected his
considerable talents to the writing of two philosophical works, the FA
YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) and the T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) ...
The initial difficulty, of course, lay in determining the exact
boundaries of each logical category, so that inferences were not
mistakenly drawn. Generations of Chinese scholars, first the early
Logicians and later the Han scholastics, devoted a great deal of time
and energy to this problem. Due to the occasional rift between logic and
language, their first task was to establish formal rules of logic (ie.
ON 28 JANUARY 2024 WE RAISED WITH YOURSELF AN IMPORTANT ISSUE OF
VARIANCE TO THE META-DESCRIPTOR NOMENCLATURE, RETENTION OF AGENCY
INTEROPERABILITY AND ITS SUITABLE REPRESENTATION OF FACULTY
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE WE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING CAN BE NUANCED
AND THAT OUR PRIOR ASSUMPTIONS CONFORMED TO THE COGITO PREMISES OR
DIALECTIC TO A DEVISED NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA:
#52 - MEASURE --> CANON = kanṓn (G2583):
#68 - DIMMING --> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE --> WORLDVIEW
AND PROVIDED TO YOU THE PROPOSITION OF THE COGITO ARRAY AS THEN THE MEAN
FOR CONSCIOUSNESS AS IMAGO DEI) by which to discover the defining
characteristics of each entity in the universe, so that essential
attributes could be clearly distinguished from accidental attributes...
While it was relatively simple to agree upon fundamental definitions for
animals, shapes, and inanimate objects, the true definition of human
nature was a thornier problem, as it touched upon a host of problems
which stubbornly resisted solution by the logical method:
- What is the proper definition of human nature?
- What is the proper sphere and existential significance of human activity?
- What can humans reasonably hope to accomplish in this life?
In the Han Confucian synthesis, then, the proto-scientist's impulse
towards categorization and the logician's search for orderly expression
joined forces with the ethical concerns of the traditional scholar.
Categorical thinking, inherently preoccupied with the relation of
macrocosm to microcosm, came to be applied to many areas of inquiry,
most significantly (1) portent theory; (2) the rectification of names;
and (3) point-by-point analogies between the human body, the body
politic, and the universe. We are familiar enough with body analogies;
we often talk of "heads of state," for example. Portent theory and the
rectification of names, however, may need some explanation for the
modern reader. {NYLAN, page 67]
The impact of YANG HSIUNG'S PHILOSOPHY on later Chinese thought is
undeniable. The historian PAN KU (32-92 CE) revered YANG HSIUNG as one
of the THREE GREAT CONFUCIAN PHILOSOPHERS OF WESTERN HAN, in company
with LIU HSIANG and LIU HSIN. PAN KU'S opinion was shared by the leading
Eastern Han thinkers, including HUAN T'AN, WANG CH'UNG, CHANG HENG, YING
SHAO, and Sung Chung, all of whom appreciated the breadth and critical
acumen of YANG HSIUNG'S writings. Through them, the T'AI HSÜAN provided
inspiration and vocabulary for the HSÜAN HSÜEH movement (in Chinese,
"Mystery Learning") of the post-Han period. The Mystery, in fact,
continued to greatly influence Chinese thought for a millennium, until
prominent SUNG thinkers like SU HSÜN (1009-1066) and CHU HSI
(1130-1200) applied contemporary standards retroactively to YANG
HSIUNG, thereby discrediting him on three counts:
(a) his service at the court of the "usurper" WANG MANG (r. 923);
(b) his outright rejection of the theory of human nature proposed by the
Confucian master Mencius (c. 371-289); and
(c) his supposed presumption in composing ''classics" in imitation of
the sages. [NYLAN, pages 1, 2]
Of course, YANG HSIUNG could claim to be emulating the model of
Confucius, who "seldom spoke of ming," presumably because the most
sacred aspects of human existence are taboo. But it is no less likely
that YANG'S reticence is meant to entice the reader to embark upon that
step-by-step immersion in the sage-author's mind that SCHOOLS THE
READER IN THE MORAL PROCESS ITSELF.
#12 - 𝌑童 = #463 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION / SABBATH
#17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE / HONOUR PARENTS
#26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY / DO NOT KILL
#65 - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY / AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY
#66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE / DO NOT STEAL
#71 - 𝍌止 = #522 - OBLIGATING NORM APPRAISAL / DON'T BEAR FALSE WITNESS
#76 - 𝍑劇 = #527 - MANIFESTING NORM APPRAISAL / DO NOT COVET
YANG HSIUNG imbedded the necessary clues to his solution for ming in
three linked statements. The longest passage begins:
Someone asked about ming. I replied, "Ming refers to the decrees of
Heaven. It has nothing to do with people's actions." "If people's
actions do not constitute ming, I beg to ask what about people's
actions?" I responded: "By [their actions] they may be preserved or
lost; by them they may live or die. [Still,] that is not ming. Ming
refers to what cannot be avoided."
A second passage from the Mystery echoes the last line of the preceding
statement with one important change; it substitutes "time" for ming or
the Decree, saying, "TIME IS WHAT CANNOT BE OVERCOME." And a third
passage repeats the association of ming with time in defining the Decree
as "what is timely or not."
YANG HSIUNG'S first statement about ming suggests that "fate" is an
adequate translation for the term if we do not invest it with
supernatural overtones. Ming in referring to time (meaning "present
circumstance" as well as "opportune time") describes the involuntary and
imposed part of human existence that will not change through individual
effort. [NYLAN, pages 39, 40]
The early Chinese assumed that the transition from primordial chaos to
civilized order represented successive stages of increasing
differentiation. In effect, the Chinese argued that the world as they
knew it had evolved by a process analogous to human attempts to
identify, demarcate, and name significant geographical, political,
social, and religious boundaries. [NOMES OF EGYPT TO NOMOS OF GREEKS BUT
IS THERE SUCH FOR SAPIENCE?]From this they concluded that there existed
in the primordial Tao a divine basis for the development of the various
human orders. Some Han thinkers even argued that humans engaged in the
search for intrinsic categories can further or complete the cosmic
processes through their continual ordering and reordering of categories.
This helps to explain why categorical thinking and correlative thought
figure so largely in Chinese philosophical writings. [NYLAN, page 68]
Among modern translators, no consensus exists about the proper
definition of ming; the term is most often rendered as fate or Decree
(as in my own introductory remarks), but it is also translated as
variously as "duty," "destiny," "predestination," "causal connections
and their possibilities," "manifestation of Heaven's will," "the
inevitable," "empirical facts," "created world," "lifespan," "objective
circumstances," "circumstances beyond human control," and so on. The
problem is not simply one of translation. Any Chinese of YANG HSIUNG'S
time would have found a bewildering array of usages for the term, some
mutually contradictory. In part, the confusion stemmed from a typical
feature of Chinese classical philosophy, in which rival thinkers
consciously used the same terminology to articulate significantly
different ideas. But there were also unconscious adoptions of meanings
through conceptual overlays and etymological extensions as the
so-called "Hundred Schools" of philosophy emerged from the earlier
religious matrix.
THERE IS THE OBVIOUS CONSIDERATION ABOUT THE INNATE LACK (ie. IF YOU
KNEW MY WORK we'd know that you've put "schools" in QUOTATION MARKS TO
INDICATE MY OWN DISTRUST of the attempt by many scholars to pigeonhole
the works of various thinkers into different "schools") OF ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY and is it any different to Samuele R. Bacchiocchi [29 January
1938 to 20 December 2008] getting doctoral thesis on "FROM SABBATH TO
SUNDAY" from the Pontifical Gregorian University?
Do we have to ask, whether such CONTEMPTUOUS NONCHALANCE (ie. perhaps
just my reply will be so pre-occupying much like throwing a dog a bone)
as reply a SUBSTANTIAL ENQUIRY is entirely due to your ACADEMIC COHORT
upon that issue being RAOUL BIRNBAUM, as to whether he is in any manner
related PIERRE BIRNBAUM as visiting PROFESSOR OF JEWISH STUDIES AT
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY and therefore a proponent of NOACHIDE LAWS (in
CONTRA to COGITO #26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU) 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
[#23, #48, #36, #81, #54] ENDORSED BY THE AMERICAN CONGRESS ON 13 APRIL
1992 AS 106 STATUTE 102 PUBLIC LAW 102-268 DESIGNATING 14 APRIL 1992 as
EDUCATION AND SHARING DAY USA) for UNTOUCHABLE GOY FILTH reinforced by
recent ANTI-ZIONIST / TORAH JEWISH CONDUCT post 7 OCTOBER 2023 and their
prohibitions on DISSEMINATING TORAH KNOWLEDGE as WORLDVIEW of IDOLATRY
in denial and its INEVITABLE NIHILISTIC CONSEQUENCE as we conveyed by
email on 1500 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2023, is the consideration of ROMAN
ERA political censure (a pious euphemism concerning death or crucifixion
for convenient opposition elimination [Acts 3:14, 26:21; Philippians
3:4-6] and more recently the WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS opened an OFFICE IN
THE VATICAN ON 19 OCTOBER 2023 in preparation for the GREATEST WHITEWASH
OF HUMAN HISTORY 1939-1945 as genocide not seen since JESUS OF NAZARETH
was linen wrapped and placed within a SEPULCHRE as COGITO #33 -
CLOSENESS (MI) - 𝌦密 = #484: 3 APRIL 33 CE [#49, #75, #62, #22, #22]
that the BIBLICAL NEW TESTAMENT record as a matter of survival, conveys
both obscured and dispersed commentary.
I CANNOT RECONCILE THE AMERICAN CONGRESS LAW ON MASQUERADING JEWISH
IDOLATRY WITH THE GOD ALMIGHTY BLASPHEMOUS SENILE AMERICAN IRISH
CATHOLIC PRESIDENT PRAYING A ROSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELIGIOUS
FALSEHOODS AND DICTUMS OF CATHOLIC CHRISTO FASCIST STATE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:226&feme:242&ontic:146&deme:71&idea:242>
#137 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#30, #2, #50, #10, #5, #40] /
#1002 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#300, #2, #700] = bên (H1121):
{UMBRA: #52 % #41 = #11} 1) son, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a)
son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d)
youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as
characterisation, i.e. sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or sons
of God [for angels]; 1g) *PEOPLE* (*OF* *A* *NATION*) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) a member of a
guild, order, class;
#39 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#6, #10, #5, #10, #2, #6] /
#77 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #146 as [#10, #5, #2, #10, #50] = yᵉhab
(H3052): {UMBRA: #17 % #41 = #17} 1) to give, provide; 1a) (P'al); 1a1)
to give; 1a2) to place, *LAY* (*FOUNDATIONS*); 1b) (Hithp'al); 1b1) to
be given; 1b2) to be paid;
#78 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #226 as [#8, #60, #4, #6] = chêçêd (H2617):
{UMBRA: #72 % #41 = #31} 1) goodness, *KINDNESS*, faithfulness; 2) a
reproach, shame;
#719 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #71 as [#2, #6, #200, #1, #10, #500] = bârâʼ
(H1254): {UMBRA: #203 % #41 = #39} 1) to create, shape, form; 1a) (Qal)
to shape, fashion, create (always with God as subject); 1a1) of heaven
and earth; 1a2) of individual man; 1a3) of new conditions and
circumstances; 1a4) of transformations; 1b) (Niphal) to be created; 1b1)
of heaven and earth; 1b2) *OF* *BIRTH*; 1b3) *OF* *SOMETHING* *NEW*;
1b4) of miracles; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to cut down; 1c2) to cut out; 1d) to
be fat; 1d1) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat;
#2105 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #242 as [#500, #400, #200, #5, #800, #200]
= phýsis (G5449): {UMBRA: #1310 % #41 = #39} 1) *NATURE*; 1a) *THE*
*NATURE* *OF* *THINGS*, *THE* *FORCE*, *LAWS*, *ORDER* *OF* *NATURE*;
1a1) as opposed to what is monstrous, abnormal, perverse; 1a2) as
opposed what has been produced by the art of man: the natural branches,
i.e. branches by the operation of nature; 1b) birth, physical origin;
1c) a mode of feeling and acting which by long habit has become nature;
1d) the sum of innate properties and powers by which one person differs
from others, distinctive native peculiarities, natural characteristics:
the natural strength, ferocity, and intractability of beasts;
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values
and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which
our great Nation, the United States of America, was founded;
Whereas President GREORGE W. BUSH, distinguished leader of our great
Nation, stated "Ethical values are the foundation for civilized society.
A society that fails to recognize or adhere to them cannot endure.";
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the comer-stone of
society since the dawn of civilization when they were known as the Seven
Noahide Laws;
Whereas the Grovernment of the United States and its citizens are
committed to the ideals of social equity and the right of each and every
person to share in the bounty the world has to offer—ideals deeply
rooted in our Nation's history and boldly affirmed by the miraculous
changes of the past year;
Whereas our Nation has recently witnessed the beginning triumph of these
values through wonders around the world of biblical proportions;
Whereas the end of the Cold War heralds the beginning of an era where
individual rights and human dignity become paramount and where the dream
of a world in which material and spiritual deprivation is replaced by
human kindness and compassion becomes a reality;
<https://www.congress.gov/102/statute/STATUTE-106/STATUTE-106-Pg102.pdf>
And therefore your saying NOTHING WORTHWHILE as reluctance to speak
against a clear instance of intellectual JEWISH dishonesty exhibited by
the MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS marked with the CHINESE: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求
(tānqiú) glyph conveying equivalent FIRST PRINCIPLES despite a lack of
any documented SEVEN day cosmogony until later antiquity as you'd know:
"TIME IS WHAT CANNOT BE OVERCOME."
Much of the work of RAOUL BIRNBAUM speaks to this issue. I have put
"schools" in quotation marks to indicate my own distrust of the attempt
by many scholars to pigeonhole the works of various thinkers into
different "schools," including Confucianism, Taoism, Legalism, and
Mohism. YANG HSIUNG himself was always careful to discuss individual
philosophers; at no point in either the FA YEN (MODEL SAYINGS) or the
T'AI HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) does he appear to envision
close links between members of a "school." LAO TZU and CHUANG TZU, for
example, are treated separately in the FY, though the two masters have
often been lumped together as "Taoists." Mencius and Hsün tzu are also
treated separately, rather than as "Confucians.'' At the same time, we
must remember that well before Yang's time, thinkers had been identified
as members of a particular philosophical "line" (chia ) numerous
concepts from thinkers outside the Confucian "school" identified by
Ssuma T'an. See FY 4:10, for example. For more on the erroneous
appellation of "schools," [NYLAN, page 472]
Even in the Confucian canon alone, a single passage by the same
classical authority may use the one character ming to denote two or
three different things, since older ideas of ming (or Decree) continued
to be used alongside newer usages. As a student of archaic language
script, YANG HSIUNG was in a better position than most to separate the
tangled strands of linguistic convention. He surely knew that early Chou
bronze inscriptions used an archaic form of ming as an alternate form of
the character ling, which indicates a superior's orders to his
subordinates. Typically, ming was associated with the king's decrees of
investiture COGITO: #81 - FOSTERING (YANG) - 𝍖養 = #532 [#72, #63, #75,
#4, #81] to his inferiors and with Heaven's decree to its chief
representative, the king. [NYLAN, page 36]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:278&feme:295&ontic:210&deme:135&idea:295>
#776 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #210 as [#50, #300, #20, #400, #6] =
nishkâh (H5393): {UMBRA: #375 % #41 = #6} 1) chamber, *ROOM*, cell;
#570 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #135 as [#70, #400, #100] /
#575 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #135 as [#70, #400, #100, #5] = ʻâthaq
(H6275): {UMBRA: #570 % #41 = #37} 1) to move, proceed, advance, move
on, become old, be removed; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move; 1a2) to advance (in
years), grow old and weak; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to move forward, proceed,
move on; 1b2) to remove; 1b3) *TO* *TRANSCRIBE*;
#152 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #278 as [#6, #70, #10, #50, #10, #6] /
#187 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #278 as [#2, #70, #10, #50, #10, #5, #40] =
ʻayin (H5869): {UMBRA: #130 % #41 = #7} 1) eye; 1a) eye; 1a1) of
physical eye; 1a2) as showing mental qualities; 1a3) *OF* *MENTAL* *AND*
*SPIRITUAL* *FACULTIES* (fig.); 1b) spring, fountain;
#700 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #295 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #200, #8, #40,
#70, #200] = parásēmos (G3902): {UMBRA: #700 % #41 = #3} 1) marked
falsely, spurious, counterfeit: as a coin; 2) marked beside or in the
margin; 2a) so noteworthy words, which the reader of a book marks on the
margin; 3) *NOTED*, *MARKED*, *CONSPICUOUS*, *REMARKABLE*; 3a) of
persons in a bad sense, notorious; 4) marked with a sign: a ship marked
with the image or figure of Dioscuri (Castor and Pollux);
#295 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 11 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#20, #200, #60,
#10, #5] = korçêʼ (H3764): {UMBRA: #281 % #41 = #35} 1) *THRONE*, royal
chair;
The ruling GREEK-EGYPTIAN EMPEROR PTOLEMY gathered 72 Torah sages, had
them sequestered in 72 separate *ROOMS*, and ordered them to each
produce a translation. On the 8TH OF TEVET / 20 DECEMBER? of the year
3515? from creation (246 BCE) they produced 72 *CORRESPONDING*
*TRANSLATIONS*, *INCLUDING* *IDENTICAL* *CHANGES* in 13 places (where
they each felt that a literal translation would constitute a corruption
of the Torah's true meaning). This Greek rendition became known as the
Septuagint, "of the seventy" (though later versions that carry this name
are not believed to be true to the originals). Greek became a
significant second language among Jews as a result of this translation.
<https://www.chabad.org>
According to an early Chou formulation, the Decree of Heaven (T'ien
ming) was a special form of covenant. The covenant essentially
stipulated that Heaven agrees to support a certain dynastic line so long
as the throne, in return, promotes the wellbeing of its subject people.
Four notable features of this covenant colored all subsequent
discussions of ming:
First and foremost, the Decree of Heaven presupposed a strong connection
between Heaven and Man, though the earliest texts are preoccupied with
the "One Man," the ruler.
Second, the Decree of Heaven implied an impartial reward given for
specific acts of "bright virtue."
Third, it viewed virtue primarily in terms of obligations to human
society, rather than religious duties.
Fourth, the Decree of Heaven promised Heaven's support to the
recipient(s) for the duration of a fixed (though unspecified) time
period, overlooking possible lapses in virtue that might occur while the
covenant was in force." [NYLAN, page 36]
NERO FUDDLES WHILE ROME BURNS SEEMINGLY HAS ANALOGIES TO SENILE US
PRESIDENTIAL ROSARY DEVOTIONS [méi guī (玫瑰): rose flower; jīng (經):
devotion; jīng guò (經過): course] V'S WAR OF THE ROSES [méi guī zhàn
zhēng (玫瑰戰爭)]
#31 - 𝌤裝 = #482
COGITO: [#79, #26, #30, #9, #54] as #31 - PACKING (CHUANG)
APPRAISAL #6: Through six junctions and round nine roads, (經六衢周九路)
No limits on their course, they ply their trade. (不限其行賈)
FATHOMING #6: Through six junctions (經六衢)
MEANS: Itinerant merchants conduct their business. (商旅事一也)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:經>
jīng (經): 1. to go through; to experience, 2. a sutra; a scripture, 3.
warp, 4. longitude, 5. often; regularly; frequently, 6. to administer;
to engage in business; to run; to operate; to manage, 7. a woman's
period, 8. to bear; to endure, 9. *TO* *HANG*; *TO* *DIE* *BY*
*HANGING*, 10. classics, 11. to be frugal; to save, 12. *A* *CLASSIC*;
*A* *SCRIPTURE*; *CANON*, 13. a standard; a norm, 14. a section of a
Confucian work, 15. to measure, 16. human pulse, 17. menstruation; a
woman's period
#25 - 𝌞爭 = #476
COGITO: [#65, #29, #79, #13, #23] as #25 - CONTENTION (CHENG)
HEAD: YANG CH'I overflows everywhere. It is "neither onesided, nor
partial," so that things vie against one another in competition, with
each one following its own proper model.
(陰氣汜施。不偏不頗。物輿爭訟。各遵其儀)
APPRAISAL #1: Contend best by not contending. (爭不爭)
Retire to obscurity. (隱冥)
FATHOMING #1: In contending, not contending (爭不爭)
MEANS: This is the normal course of the Way. (道之素也)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:爭>
#32 - 𝌥衆 = #483
COGITO: [#54, #77, #61, #71, #11] as #32 - LEGION (CHUANG)
APPRAISAL #3: As conscripts load the carts (軍或累車)
A soldier pushes wife and child away. (丈人摧孥)
While rifts inside grow wider. (內蹈之瑕)
FATHOMING #3: That some in the army load carts (軍或累車)
MEANS: Councils of war draw harm within. (廟戰內傷也)
APPRAISAL #5: Pitched battles to the din of bell and drum: (躆戰喈喈)
Like bears, like demons they clash. (若熊若螭)
FATHOMING #5: Locked in combat, clash! clash! (躆戰喈喈)
MEANS: He is king by brute force alone. (恃力作王也)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:戰>
zhàn (戰): 1. war; fighting; battle, 2. to fight, 3. to shiver; to
shudder; to tremble, 4. Zhan, 5. *TO* *DEBATE*; *TO* *DISPUTE*
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:爭>
zhēng (爭): 1. to compete; to struggle; to fight; to contend; to strive,
2. to snatch; to capture, 3. to debate; to dispute, 4. to lack; to
differ; to vary, 5. *TO* *ADVISE* *AGAINST*, 6. how; what way; what, 7.
very; extremely
But the indecency of which you speak as "IDEAS ARE INDEPENDENTLY
DEVELOPED IN DIFFERENT CULTURES" having a DIVINATION, NECROMANCY (eg:
THE SENILE US PRESIDENTIAL ROSARY DEVOTIONS BY A CATHOLIC
CHRISTO-FASCIST IN DENIAL) or an ASTROLOGICAL / ZODIAC BASIS: "For the
invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew
God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became
vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the
glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible
man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things." [Romans
1:20-23]
It must be a common disease amongst especially AMERICANS given that
during a 8 FEBRUARY 2024 press conference, US PRESIDENT BIDEN told
reporters, “My memory is fine.” In response to Hur’s report, Biden said,
“I’m well-meaning, and I’m an elderly man, and I know what the hell I’m
doing. I’ve been president. I put this country back on its feet. I don’t
need his recommendation.”
“Let me tell you something. Some of you have commented. I wear, since
the day he died every single day, the rosary he got from our Lady of …”
Biden continued before suddenly appearing to forget which parish his
son’s rosary came from [or that during his "bury my disgraced corpse in
this place" tour of IRELAND imputed our DEMOCRACY].
<https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/02/videos-biden-forgets-things-in-speech-defending-his-memory/>
#46 - 𝌳廓 = #497
COGITO: [#35, #75, #15, #56, #39] as #46 - ENLARGEMENT (K'UO)
[#35 {@1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35)}
#75 {@2: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#64); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH
(#110 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%30})}
#15 {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#108 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%25}); Ego:
15 - REACH: TA (#125)}
#56 {@4: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#127); Ego: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH:
CHIN (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} /
I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING{%35})}
#39] {@5: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN
BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD
{%38} / I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38})}
TELOS TOTAL: #220
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:185&feme:220&ontic:586&deme:438&idea:220>
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #586
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #438
#949 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #220 as [#2, #1, #300, #40, #200, #6, #400]
= ʼashmurâh(H821): {UMBRA: #546 % #41 = #13} 1) watch (a period of
time), *NIGHT*-*WATCH*;
On Friday, 15 JULY 2022, at the end of his formal visit to the
Palestinian Authority, US PRESIDENT BIDEN's convoy headed [ie. jīng guò
(經過): *TO* *GO* *THROUGH*] toward Manger Square. Saint Catherine’s,
adjacent to the basilica, is where the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem
traditionally holds the crowded *MIDNIGHT* Mass on Christmas Eve. Last
Friday, anticipating Mr. Biden’s visit, it was empty.
#11 - 𝌐差 = #462
COGITO: [#50, #54, #68, #38, #6] as #11 - DIVERGENCE (CH'A)
APPRAISAL #4: Passing over small acts of goodness, (過小善善)
He will not overcome. (不克)
FATHOMING #4: Foregoing small acts of goodness (過小善)
MEANS: He cannot reach greatness. (不能至大也)
guò (過): 1. to cross; to go over; to pass, 2. too, 3. particle to
indicate experience, 4. to surpass; to exceed, 5. to experience; to pass
time, 6. to go, 7. a mistake, 8. a time; a round, 9. Guo, 10. to die,
11. to shift, 12. to endure, 13. *TO* *PAY* *A* *VISIT*; *TO* *CALL* *ON*
#220 as [#10, #100, #4, #40, #6, #50, #10] = qâdam (H6923): {UMBRA: #144
% #41 = #21} 1) to meet, come or be in front, confront, go before; 1a)
(Piel); 1a1) to meet, confront, come to meet, *RECEIVE*; 1a2) to go
before, go in front, be in front; 1a3) to lead, be beforehand,
anticipate, forestall; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to come in front; 1b2) to
confront, anticipate;
#570 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #185 as [#10, #4, #200, #300, #50, #6] =
dârash (H1875): {UMBRA: #504 % #41 = #12} 1) to resort to, seek, seek
with care, enquire, require; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to resort to, frequent (a
place), (tread a place); 1a2) to consult, enquire of, seek; i) of God;
ii) of heathen gods, necromancers; 1a3) *TO* *SEEK* *DEITY* *IN*
*PRAYER* *AND* *WORSHIP*; I) God; ii) heathen deities; 1a4) to seek
(with a demand), demand, require; 1a5) to investigate, enquire; 1a6) to
ask for, require, demand; 1a7) to practice, study, follow, seek with
application; 1a8) to seek with care, care for; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to
allow oneself to be enquired of, consulted (only of God); 1b2) to be
sought, be sought out; 1b3) to be required (of blood);
“After going to the grotto he came to Saint Catherine’s Church, where I
#220 - *RECEIVED* him,” Father Faltas said, in an exclusive interview
with America. “He arrived with the Custos and only one Secret Service
agent.”
“He took a rosary out of his pocket, saying, ‘I ALWAYS PRAY WITH A
ROSARY,’ and remembered his son Beau. He cried. He was very emotional,”
Father Faltas said, about the moment in which Mr. Biden kneeled alone in
a wooden pew, the rosary in his hands, and *PRAYED*.
#868 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #220 as [#30, #2, #400, #6, #30, #400] =
bᵉthûwlâh(H1330): {UMBRA: #443 % #41 = #33} 1) *VIRGIN*;
-- THE HAIL MARY --
"Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with you;
blessed are you among women,
and blessed is the fruit of your womb, Jesus.
Holy Mary, Mother of God,
pray for us sinners
now and at the hour of our death. (#469 / #386)
Amen." (#486 / #401)
#220 as [#40, #80, #50, #10, #40] = pânîym (H6440): {UMBRA: #180 % #41 =
#16} 1) face; 1a) face, faces; 1b) presence, person; 1c) *FACE* (*OF*
*SERAPHIM* *OR* *CHERUBIM*); 1d) face (of animals); 1e) face, surface
(of ground); 1f) as adv of loc/temp; 1f1) before and behind, toward, in
front of, forward, formerly, from beforetime, before; 1g) with prep;
1g1) in front of, before, to the front of, in the presence of, in the
face of, at the face or front of, from the presence of, from before,
from before the face of;
YOUTUBE: "Queen (Sister Act - Hail Holy)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctjG4MjJwEA>
#1576 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #469 as [#1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #200,
#300, #800, #200] = anankastōs (G317): {UMBRA: #1576 % #41 = #18} 1) by
*FORCE* *OR* *CONSTRAIN*;
#929 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #486 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9,
#8, #200, #70, #50, #300, #1, #10] = apokrínomai (G611): {UMBRA: #452 %
#41 = #1} 1) *TO* *GIVE* *AN* *ANSWER *TO* *A* *QUESTION* *PROPOSED*,
*TO* *ANSWER*; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer;
#161 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #586 as [#10, #70, #50, #6, #20, #5] =
ʻânâh (H6030): {UMBRA: #125 % #41 = #2} 1) to answer, respond, testify,
speak, shout; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to answer, respond to; 1a2) to testify,
respond as a witness; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to make answer; 1b2) to be
answered, receive answer; 1c) (Qal) *TO* *SING*, *UTTER* *TUNEFULLY*;
1d) (Qal) to dwell;
Mr. Biden appeared to still be affected by the experience when he got up
and began walking around Saint Catherine’s. “To his left, a group of
children began to *SING* for him—I don’t remember which song—but a group
of kids from the Terra Sancta school, from different grades, began
singing,” Father Faltas said, “and this seemed to comfort him.
#1351 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #438 as [#80, #10, #1, #200, #800, #200,
#10, #50] = piázō (G4084): {UMBRA: #898 % #41 = #37} 1) to *LAY* *HOLD*
*OF*; 2) to take, capture; 2a) of fishes; 3) to apprehend; 3a) of a man,
in order to imprison him;
“He walked right into the group of them, *HUGGING* *THEM*, and composed
himself with them. He spoke of his son, and a barrier seemed to fall. It
was his choice to join them. He wanted to go and kiss the children.”
And then the president turned to leave. “He said goodbye to the
Franciscans at the door and went on his way,” Father Faltas said. Mr.
Biden drove from Bethlehem to Jerusalem, only six miles away, where he
boarded a helicopter for a departure ceremony at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion
Airport, from which he flew directly to Jeddah, in Saudi Arabia.
<https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2022/07/19/joe-biden-bethlehem-church-243380>
cè (測): 1. to measure, 2. to test, 3. a measure of depth, 4. clear, 5.
interrogate with torture, 6.deep, 7. to conjecture; to estimate
The CRUX of the matter is that there are 2 x #364 = #728 cosmological
considerations within the T'AI HSŨAN CHING by YANG HSIUNG associated to
the TETRAGRAMS in conformity with the GRAND INCEPTION (Tàichū: 太初)
[TETRA: #36 / #7] new moon 🌑 on 21 DECEMBER 104 BCE (103 BCE with #0
CE) + 32 x 19 metonic lunar cycles = #505 CE as MALKUTH (kingdom) - IN
CONTENTION WITH THE BIPARITE #15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111 ... #175 ...
#260... #369 as #71 - ROMAN DICTATORSHIP WORLDVIEW ... 21 DECEMBER 2006
... 21 DECEMBER 2025) and the notion of TRIPARTITE NUMBER: "Confucians
of the Western Han dynasty (206 B.C.A.D. 8) presumed philosophical
consistency in the Changes text for several reasons. Tradition told them
that the Changes had originated in a set of cosmic emblems (three-line
graphs called "trigrams") invented by the first culture hero, and then
expanded by successive great sages of hoary antiquity into the
well-known six-line graphs ("hexagrams"), which are 64 in number [as
equivalent to a concept of BIPARTITE #1080 - HETEROS NUMBER in
expressing a TENET PRINCIPLE: #57, #43, #41, #39, #25 of ROMAN
GOVERNANCE]. One popular legend also depicted the mature Confucius
diligently studying the Changes text to perfect his understanding. For
these reasons, Han scholars looked to the Changes to express a PERFECT
VISION OF SAGEHOOD AND THE COSMOS. Despite the frustrations occasioned
by the incredible diversity of the Changes text, Han scholars worked
hard to find underlying principles in the sequence of hexagrams and
their internal structure. In seeking structure in the Changes, they
found structure [IN CONSTITUTING A FINELY GRADED SEQUENCE OF EIGHTY-ONE
PHASES IN THE ANNUAL CYCLE, A VIRTUAL COSMIC PATTERN IN THE FORM OF A
METAPHYSICAL PROSE-POEM, PAGE 15]; and where there was none to find,
they invented structure to satisfy their need for coherence." [NYLAN,
page 7]


It is therefore a distinct SOVEREIGN claim as a SCHOOL OF THOUGHT
(bottom) which by its COURSE-trochos of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] then
differs to the LUOSHU SQUARE DEPENDENCY (ie. the centre 3x3 matrix to
the Graeco-Roman Square pairs as a DOMINION control to the LUOSHU Square
anchors and the hypotenuse similarly to the #71 - DOMINION array)
conception of NATURE as GRECO-ROMAN #71 - WORLDVIEW (top) OF
CHRISTO-FASCISM OF WHICH THE IRISH CATHOLIC US PRESIDENT IS AN ADHERENT
as then a distinct but nonetheless common COSMOGONY expressed as the
TORAH of 49J1W2D (49th JUBILEE + 9 YEARS) + 40 YEARS DESERT SOJOURN:
"Wherefore I [did] ordain for thee the year-weeks and the years and the
jubilees: there are forty-nine jubilees from the days of Adam until this
day, and one week and two years and there are yet forty years to come
(literally “distant”) for learning the COMMANDMENTS OF THE LORD..."
[Jubilee 50:4]
It must have been an acute aspiration over an IMPUTATION TO A LACK OF
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY which was the cause for your reply "MANY IDEAS ARE
INDEPENDENTLY DEVELOPED IN DIFFERENT CULTURES" since I previously @ 1642
HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2023 conveyed to you the entire COGITO PENTAMORPH
ARRAY and NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA with #451 - PRAXIS OR RATIONALITY
COEFFICIENT as HEBREW / GREEK correspondences being a common cosmogony
and nomenclature of an anthropocentric sapient humanity to which
cohesion of thought (ie. whether mythos or fact as scientific views of
temporality and consciousness instantiation here and now) occurs.
But let's raise some reasonable points of CULPABILITY that you have with
your published translation and commentary of the CHINESE DAOist text
known as THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY published in 4 BCE pertaining to
EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
-- c. 1626 CE edition of the book in HARVARD LIBRARY
-- 1922 edition of the book (et al) source with UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
-- 1927 edition of the book (et al) source with UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
The ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS (1689) allowed Protestant citizens of England
to "have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as
allowed by Law" right to bear arms "when Papists were both Armed and
Imployed contrary to Law" was an inspiration for the American Bill of
Rights. Both require jury trials, contain a right to keep and bear arms,
prohibit excessive bail and forbid "cruel and unusual punishments". Many
liberties protected by state constitutions and the Virginia Declaration
of Rights were incorporated into the Bill of Rights. Upon the arrival of
the American Revolution, many of the rights guaranteed by the Federal
Bill of Rights were recognized as being inspired by English law. A
substantial body of thought had been developed from the literature of
republicanism in the United States, typically demonstrated by the works
of John Adams, who often quoted Blackstone and Montesquieu verbatim, and
applied to the creation of state constitutions.
THE PRESENT BORDER CRISIS AND THE LACK OF ITS DEFENCE BY ARMED MILITIA
WHO PREFER TO SLAUGHTER PEOPLE WITHIN SCHOOLS, DISCOS, SUPERMARKETS OR
IN THE STREETS CONVEYS A CLEAR AMBIGUITY ABOUT THE NATURE OF CITIZEN
RIGHTS AND AVARICIOUS "GREED IS GOOD" WANT.
While the ideas of unalienable rights, the separation of powers and the
structure of the Constitution were largely influenced by the European
Enlightenment thinkers, like Montesquieu, John Locke and others,
Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson still had reservations about the
existing forms of government in Europe.[100] In a speech at the
Constitutional Convention Franklin stated, "We have GONE BACK TO ANCIENT
HISTORY FOR MODELS OF GOVERNMENT, and examined different forms of those
Republics ... And we have viewed modern States all round Europe but find
none of their Constitutions suitable to our circumstances."
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA #90 - 3 /4 JANUARY 1942: "For
two thousand years the expression "CAESAR" personified the supreme
authority. The Japanese also have their own expression to indicate the
highest authority: they say "Tenno", which means "Son of Heaven". The
Japanese are still at the point where we were sixteen hundred years ago,
before the Church crept into the affair.” [page 174]
Given the meta-descriptive principles of tetragrams #1 - 𝌆中 = #452 -
CHINA to which we have assigned a #451 - praxis of rationality
co-efficient and a pentamorphic COGITO: [#67, #14, #35, #15, #19] as #1
- CENTRE (CHUNG) ARRAY are entirely UNIVERSAL VALUES of humanism.
The #CENTER (205 <-> 164) intersection of the 9x9x9 = 729 appraisals and
nomenclature as its ONTIC premise being an extension of the COGITO to
include the SEPTET VOLUNTĀTIS / TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPES OF ANTIQUITY
produces the IDEA TEMPLATE TO QUEEN VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:205&intersect:164&type:1>
You may have different semantics and political consensus but at core it
is a common anthropocentric / cosmogonic reality.
We had sometime ago provided Oxford University (never a response) with
details of HITLER'S TABLE TALK anchoring [#26, #34, #30, #33] by
exhibiting an equivalent locus as referencing (ie. knowledge likely
being associative with Japanese Sino conquest) to the CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY as then unequivocally associated to the LUO SHU #369 MAGIC
SQUARE REFERENCE OBJECT / JUPITER (#135 / #405 / #540 - STOICHEION OF
THE KOSMOS) PRINCIPLE but also seemingly conforming to the #249 - SATOR?
/ #205 - TENET? / #161 - ROTAS? contrivance (ie. as field for spacial
watch / actionable zones rather than 5 x #73 cyclical progression
stages) of the BIPARTITE NUMBER (@1 - FASCISM IS A RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME; @5 - THE STATE IS THE GREATEST ROMAN
INVENTION) PARADIGM as being pseudo metaphysics.
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM [#33] -> #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN): 12 - 16 DECEMBER
AS IDEA #75 - 13 DECEMBER 1941: "The war will be over one day. I shall
then consider that my life's final task [qín (勤): *DILIGENTLY*;
*INDUSTRIOUSLY*, *DUTY*; *WORK*] will be to *SOLVE* *THE* *RELIGIOUS*
*PROBLEM*. Only then will the life of the German native be guaranteed
once and for all.
I don't interfere in matters of belief. Therefore I can't allow
churchmen to interfere with temporal affairs. The organised lie must be
smashed. The State must remain the absolute master." [pages 143]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:勤>
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM [#26] -> #12 - YOUTHFULNESS (T'UNG): 9 - 13
FEBRUARY AS IDEA #147 - 10 FEBRUARY 1942: "He believed that anyone who
runs over a *CHILD* [tóng (童): *CHILD*] should be put in prison at once.
He didn't skirt the edge of the road, as many people do, but instead he
stuck rather to the top of the camber, always mindful of the *CHILD*
[tóng (童): *CHILD*] who might unexpectedly emerge." [page 309]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:童>
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM [#34] -> #53 - ETERNITY (YUNG): 13 - 17 AUGUST AS
IDEA #290 / #291 - 16 AUGUST 1942: "Stalin is an anarchist educated in
an ecclesiastical college! Our newspapers ought to ask whether he and
Churchill *SANG* *PSALMS* [yǒng (永): *TO* *SING*; *TO* *CHANT*] together
in Moscow!" [page 636]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:永>
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM [#30] -> #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHO): 31 AUGUST - 4
SEPTEMBER AS IDEA #306 - 31 AUGUST 1942: "Churchill, the raddled old
whore of journalism, picked up a few crumbs. Churchill is an
*UNPRINCIPLED* [shǒu (守): *PERSONAL* *INTEGRITY*; *MORAL* *CHARACTER*]
*SWINE*. A perusal of his memoirs proves it; in them he strips himself
naked before the public. God help a nation that accepts the leadership
of a Thing like that!" [page 678]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:守>
Accordingly to MAO TSE-TUNG's AUGUST 1937 treatise ON CONTRADICTION:
"The law of contradiction in things, that is, the law of the unity of
opposites, is the fundamental law of nature and of society and therefore
also the fundamental law of thought, is the basic law of materialist
dialectics. Lenin said, "Dialectics in the proper sense is the study of
contradiction in the very essence of objects." Lenin often called this
law the essence of dialectics; he also called it the kernel of dialectics.
#27 - DUTIES (SHIH) as [#8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS /
DISTORTION (HSIEN), #4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO)] /
#432 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 30 NOVEMBER 2023 as [#8, #10, #4,
#400, #10] /
#468 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN) as [#6,
#8, #10, #4, #400, #40] = chîydâh (H2420): {UMBRA: #27 % #41 = #27} 1)
riddle, difficult question, parable, enigmatic saying or question,
perplexing saying or question; 1a) riddle (dark obscure utterance); 1b)
riddle, enigma (to be guessed); 1c) *PERPLEXING* *QUESTIONS*
(*DIFFICULT*); 1d) double dealing (with 'havin');
In studying this law, therefore, we cannot but touch upon a variety of
#468 - *QUESTIONS*, upon a number of philosophical problems. If we can
become clear on all these problems, we shall arrive at a fundamental
understanding of materialist dialectics. The problems are: the two world
outlooks (ie. the dialectical conception and the metaphysical conception
as HSUAN (玄) HSUEH / XUE (學) MYSTERY LEARNING: fǎ dù (法度): [#40 - 𝌭法 =
#491 / #52 - 𝌹度 = #503] - (A) LAW / within APPRAISAL #5: the expression
(非學方也) means: "THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO STUDY" as that which evolved from
the later HAN DYNASTY of 25-220 CE
NOTE that the notion xué shù (學術): *SCIENCE* has a single occurrence of
shù (術) within the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (太玄經) of 4 BCE is then
associated with an anomalous exclusion of any CHINESE ENGLISH PINYIN
lexicon entries for TETRA #17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 as to suggested a HOMOGENEOUS
social reform as COMMUNIST political action which is inferred by the
APPRAISAL #7: (執其術 / 共所歾) expression meaning "HOLDING FAST HIS
PRINCIPLES. HE OFFERS HIS LIFE FOR THE CAUSE."
zhí (執): 1. *TO* *IMPLEMENT*; *TO* *CARRY* *OUT*; *TO* *EXECUTE* *A*
*PLAN*, 2. a post; a position; a job, 3. to grasp; to hold, 4. *TO*
*GOVERN*; *TO* *ADMINISTER*; to be in charge of, 5. to arrest; to
capture, 6. to maintain; to guard, 7. to block up, 8. to engage in, 9.
to link up; to draw in, 10. a good friend, 11. proof; certificate;
receipt; voucher
qí (其): 1. his; hers; its; theirs, 2. to add emphasis, 3. used when
asking a question in reply to a question, 4. used when making a request
or giving an order, 5. he; her; it; them, 6. probably; likely, 7. will,
8. may, 9. if, 10. or, 11. Qi
shù (術): 1. *METHOD*; *TACTICS*, 2. skill, 3. *ART*, 4. specialized;
technical, 5. a street; a road, 6. divination, 7. administrative
division, 8. to narrate; to recount, 9. shu
gòng (共): 1. together, 2. to share, 3. *COMMUNIST*, 4. *TO* *CONNECT*;
*TO* *JOIN*; *TO* *COMBINE*, 5. to include, 6. all together; in total,
7. same; in common, 8. and, 9. to cup one fist in the other hand, 10.
*TO* *SURROUND*; *TO* *CIRCLE*, 11. to provide, 12. respectfully, 13. Gong
suǒ (所): 1. measure word for houses, small buildings and institutions,
2. *AN* *OFFICE*; *AN* *INSTITUTE*, 3. introduces a relative clause, 4.
it, 5. if; supposing, 6. a few; various; some, 7. a place; a location,
8. indicates a passive voice, 9. that which, 10. an ordinal number, 11.
meaning, 12. garrison
mò (歾): drown; to end; to die
), the universality of contradiction, the particularity of
contradiction, the principal contradiction and the principal aspect of a
contradiction, the identity and struggle of the aspects of a
contradiction, and the place of antagonism in contradiction. [MAO
TSE-TUNG, ON CONTRADICTION, AUGUST 1937]
#81 - TETRADS TO H'AI HSÜAN CHING (4 BCE) BEING IMPLICIT TO CHINESE IDENTITY

#205 - COSMOLOGICAL DIAGRAM OF THE DRAGON KING / DRAGON GODS (龙神 LÓNGSHÉN)
Author: Aethelwolf Emsworth (Own work, Public Domain)
Each one of the four Dragon Kings of the Four Seas (四海龍王 Sìhǎi Lóngwáng)
each share the surname Ao (敖, meaning "playing" or "*PROUD*") and are
associated to a colour and a body of water corresponding to one of the
four cardinal directions and natural boundaries of China:
THE AZURE DRAGON or Blue-Green Dragon (靑龍 Qīnglóng), or Green Dragon (蒼龍
Cānglóng), is the Dragon God of the east, and of the essence of spring.
His proper name is Ao Guang (敖廣 or 敖光), and he is the patron of the East
China Sea.
THE RED DRAGON (赤龍 Chìlóng or 朱龍 Zhūlóng, literally "Cinnabar Dragon",
"Vermilion Dragon") is the Dragon God of the south and of the essence of
summer. He is the patron of the South China Sea and his proper name is
Ao Qin (敖欽).
THE BLACK DRAGON (黑龍 Hēilóng), also called "Dark Dragon" or "Mysterious
Dragon" (玄龍 Xuánlóng), is the Dragon God of the north and the essence of
winter. His proper names are Ao Shun (敖順) or Ao Ming (敖明), and his body
of water is Lake Baikal.
THE WHITE DRAGON (白龍 Báilóng) is the Dragon God of the west and the
essence of autumn. His proper names are Ao Run (敖閏), Ao Jun (敖君) or Ao
Ji (敖吉). He is the patron of Qinghai Lake.
Similarly it was upon consideration (with no reply so thank-you for your
condescension) over the philosophical metaphysical notion of "KÍNETIC AS
EUPHEMISM FOR WAR" (or later more properly #498 - KINESIS identified
with HILTER'S SUICIDE VIA A GUNSHOT TO THE HEAD on 30 APRIL 1945 and
LIQUIDATION OF THE KRAKOW GHETTO on 13 MARCH 1943) we conveyed an email
@ 1342 HOURS ON 3 DECEMBER 2022 to Doctor JAMES HOWARD-JOHNSTON
(University of Oxford, Centre for Late Antiquity) and Professor BLAIR
WORDEN (University of Oxford, Faculty of History) titled "INFORMAL
RESEARCH ON HITLER'S TABLE TALK AS TRANSLATED BY THE LATE HUGH REDWALD
TREVOR-ROPER" and articulated the observation that the "following
symmetry of IDEAS suggests that the #34 - JUPITER (#135 / #540)
PRINCIPLE as bipartite notion derived from a tripartite referencing
template [as] STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS (LUOSHU ORDER) #369 - MATRIX
[and] JUXTAPOSITION CONTROLLER likely underpins the REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM
as the TABLE TALK (1941-1944) being then deployed as a μετακίνησις
(metakínēsis) / ONTIC: #338, DEME: #328, MALE: #450, FEME: #277 schema
against the autonomy as #2371 as [@277, @526, @338, @450, @328, @452] =
sōmatikōs (G4985): *BODILY* or *CORPORALLY*.
I put the notion to you PROFESSOR MICHAEL NYLAN that there is a #27 -
DUTY to discharge an accountability for the literary work titled T'AI
HSÜAN CHING (CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY) which you translated with
commentary in 1993 that by the unrequited evidence above, was
responsible for World War II as the deadliest military conflict in
history. An estimated total of 70–85 million people perished, or about
3% of the 2.3 billion (est.) people that comprised the global population
in 1940.
Given such conflagration was for NAZI GERMANY the continuation of the
earlier 1914–1918 war where the total number of military and civilian
casualties in World War I was about 40 million: estimates range from
around 15 to 22 million deaths and about 23 million wounded military
personnel, ranking it among the deadliest conflicts in human history.
I've patience waited over 22 years for there to have been some requital
as acknowledgement over labouring for over 30 years as prior to
AMERICA's time of their need of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 and I am appalled by
the PUBLIC SLANDER which I have received, but what do you expect when
they legislate JEWISH myths as blasphemy -- 106 STATUTE 102 PUBLIC LAW
102-268 ON 13 APRIL 1992.
So we make this public testimony against you for we know from news media
reporting of US PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP's term of office that AMERICAN's
are insensitive towards any compulsion to give truthful answers.
A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Gnosis%20Ex%20Machina%20Moral%20Code.pdf>
Revision Date: 11 February 2024
On 10/2/2024 13:20, dolf wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/2024 07:28, Michael Christ wrote:
>>>> 1) There is no Jew or Gentile.
>>>>
>>>> 2) You are the phallus worshiper.
>>>>
>>>> 3) You can't win because you are a sinner Christian, a fake.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> -- IMAGO DEI / ELOHIM AS MORAL CODE FOR MACHINE INTELLIGENCE
>
> (c) 2024 Dolf Leendert Boek, Published: 9 February 2024
>
> Just a word of caution before we begin our memeBrain chat concept
> inclusion, that our interest is primarily concerned with news media and
> its #237 - PROPAGANDIST as BIPARTITE CHANGES (ie. LUO SHU SQUARE
> PROTOTYPE #EIGHT with a TRIPARTITE watch as RIGHTS COGITO #68 - 𝍉瞢 =
> #519) role in relation to the mediated self as by “referencing”
> representing a contingent #316 - CAUSE which is #71 - DOMINATIVE (ie. it
> dominates) upon the SELF as then invoking an inordinate desire for some
> supposed good (altruism but may include cupidity, avarice, greed,
> covetousness):
>
> 1. To control, govern, or rule by superior authority or power:
> Successful leaders dominate events rather than react to them.
> 2. To exert a supreme, guiding influence on or over: Ambition dominated
> their lives.
> 3.
> a. To enjoy a commanding, controlling position in: a drug company
> that dominates the tranquilizer market.
> b. To be the most abundant in: Grasses dominate most salt marshes.
> 4. To overlook from a height: a view from the cliffside chalet that
> dominates the valley.
>
> 1. To have or exert strong authority or mastery.
> 2. To be situated in or occupy a position that is more elevated or
> decidedly superior to others.
> 3. To be predominant in an ecosystem.
>
> But more than that is the #303 - TALL POPPY SYNDROME which has an
> impudent desire to USURP the natural state of #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
> CONTROL (adapting technology to the needs of war) by a disproportionate
> action of some NATURAL IMPETUS either of the BIPARTITE #450 - CHANGES
> PARADIGM itself or auto-suggestion of an impaired HEMISPHERIC #369 -
> DISCERNMENT as a WANT for which we have the TRIPARTITE watch as
> METHODOLOGY COGITO #45 - 𝌲大 = #496 [noting that shē qiú (奢求): to make
> extravagant demands or an unreasonable request resolves to this MEASURE).
>
> shē (奢): 1. extravagant; wasteful, 2. to exaggerate
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:奢>
>
> And this is where the expression known as the LAW OF JANTE comes into
> consideration and particularly the eleventh rule recognized as "THE
> PENAL CODE OF JANTE" which is:
>
> PERHAPS YOU DON'T THINK WE KNOW A FEW THINGS ABOUT YOU?
>
> The LAW OF JANTE originates from a 1933 satirical novel by Scandinavian
> author AKSEL SANDEMOSE. It contains rules and stipulations such as
> "YOU'RE NOT TO THINK YOU ARE ANYTHING SPECIAL" and "YOU'RE NOT TO LAUGH
> AT US".
>
> 
>
> YOUTUBE: “TERMINATOR AMBIENT SOUNDSCAPE”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MUOwIvkY1Y>
>
> A possible outcome to our further development of the memeBrain chat
> concept is that we’ll likely be able to identify some characteristics of
> the ONTIC GROUNDING as defining the @113 - ETHICAL BASIS FOR ENGAGEMENT
> (#45 - METHODOLOGY + #68 - RIGHTS) as to the nature to any #451 - PRAXIS
> OF RATIONALITY —> IDEA RESOLUTION PAIRING or indeed dominant CATEGORIES
> OF UNDERSTANDING or patterned IDEAS which strongly conform to any
> PROTOTYPE within the chimeric BIPARTITE CHANGES nomenclature for which
> we have several TRIPARTITE watch appraisals such as disposition towards
> LAWFULNESS COGITO #64 - 𝍅沈 = #515 or TRUSTWORTHINESS COGITO #74 - 𝍏䦯 =
> #525.
>
> Mandarin: 貪財 (tāncái) / 貪求 (tānqiú)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:貪>
>
> tān (貪): 1. to be greedy; to lust after, 2. to embezzle; to graft, 3.
> to prefer, 4. to search for; to seek, 5. corrupt
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:64>
>
> #64 - 𝍅沈 = #515 - LAWFULNESS
> COGITO: [#65, #65, #64, #21, #9] as #64 - SINKING (CH'EN)
>
> APPRAISAL #9: Bloodstained, the hard steel (血如剛)
> Sinks into the forehead. (沈於顙)
> First a master, but later mined. (前屍後喪)
> FATHOMING #9: Bloody steel sunk in the head (血剛沈顙)
> MEANS: In the end, defeated by greed. (終以貪敗也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:74>
>
> #74 - 𝍏䦯 = #525 - TRUSTWORTHINESS
> COGITO: [#66, #5, #61, #55, #22] as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
>
>
> APPRAISAL #5: Gnawing bones, he breaks his teeth— (齧骨折齒)
> Enough to fill a crock. (滿缶)
> FATHOMING #5: Gnawing bones and breaking teeth (齧骨折齒)
> MEANS: He greatly covets profit. (大貪利也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:求>
>
> qiú (求): 1. to request, 2. to seek; to look for, 3. to implore, 4. to
> aspire to, 5. to be avaricious; to be greedy; to covet, 6. to attract,
> 7. to bribe, 8. Qiu, 9. to demand, 10. to end
>
> "BEHOLD, THOU ART CALLED A JEW, AND RESTEST IN THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ (守
> 法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - 𝌾守 = #508 / #40 - 𝌭法 = #491),
> AND MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE
> THINGS THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW; AND ART
> CONFIDENT THAT THOU THYSELF ART A GUIDE OF THE BLIND (ie. APPRAISALS #2
> / #3 TO COGITO #64 - 𝍅沈 = #515 - LAWFULNESS),
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:67>
>
> #67 - 𝍈晦 = #518
> COGITO: [#48, #18, #29, #38, #42] as #67 - DARKENING (HUI)
>
> APPRAISAL #2: Blindly forging ahead, he meets obstructions. (盲征否)
> FATHOMING #2: Blindly marching into obstacles (盲征否)
> MEANS: Clearly, he does not see the Way. (明不見道也)
>
> máng (盲): 1. *BLIND*, 2. hazy; dim, 3. to gaze, 4. a blind person, 5.
> *A* *PERSON* *LACKING* *SOME* *SPECIFIC* *KNOWLEDGE*, 6. thoughtlessly,
> 7. *UNPERCEPTIVE*; shortsighted
>
> #5 - 𝌊少 = #456
> COGITO: [#60, #45, #5, #21, #11] as #5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO)
>
> APPRAISAL #1: In *DARKNESS*, he makes himself small, (冥自少)
> Becoming consummately humble. (眇于謙)
> FATHOMING #1: In obscurity, self-deprecation (冥自少)
> MEANS: He conceals his humility. (不見謙也)
>
> miǎo (眇): 1. blind in one eye; *BLIND*, 2. tiny, 3. to squint, 4. to
> stare; to examine, 5. remote, 6. to the utmost, 7. sublime
>
> A LIGHT OF THEM WHICH ARE IN *DARKNESS*, AN INSTRUCTOR OF THE FOOLISH, A
> TEACHER OF BABES, WHICH HAST THE FORM OF KNOWLEDGE AND OF THE TRUTH IN
> THE LAW.
>
> THOU THEREFORE WHICH TEACHEST ANOTHER (ie. APPRAISAL #3 TO COGITO #68 -
> 𝍉瞢 = #519), TEACHEST THOU NOT THYSELF? THOU THAT PREACHEST A MAN SHOULD
> NOT STEAL (ie. APPRAISAL #6 TO COGITO #66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF
> PERSISTENCE), DOST THOU STEAL? (ie. APPRAISALS #5 / #6 TO COGITO #53 - 𝌺
> 永 = #504)
>
> #66 - 𝍇去 = #517
> COGITO: [#57, #17, #17, #69, #62] as #66 - DEPARTURE (CH'U)
>
> APPRAISAL #6: He freely leaves his achievements behind. (躬去于成)
> Heaven will grant him its name. (天遺其名)
> FATHOMING #6: Willing to leave his success behind (躬去于成)
> MEANS: He declines to occupy a position. (攘不居也)
>
> rǎng (攘): 1. to seize; to take by force, 2. to expel; to repel, 3. *TO*
> *STEAL*, 4. to pull out; to extract; to eliminate, 5. to roll up
> [sleeves], 6. to tolerate, 7. to yield, 8. to disturb, 9. *TO* *MAKE*
> *AN* *OFFERING* *TO* *A* *DEITY* *TO* *AVOID* *BAD* *LUCK*
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:攘>
>
> Three deities known as “Sanxing” are the Chinese god of luck. When these
> three luck deities are displayed in your house or business, they offer
> wealth, prosperity, and longevity luck. “Sanxing” is a combination of
> San (three) and Xing (stars). The three members of the trinity are the
> God or “Star” of wealth or blessings (fuxing 福星) represents good
> fortune and harmony, the God of prosperity (luxing 祿星) represents
> authority, power, and wealth, and the God of longevity (shouxing 壽星
> --> 守) represents excellent health and longevity. They are shown as a
> trinity in a single artwork or drawing or as three individual figures.
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:53>
>
> #53 - 𝌺永 = #504
> COGITO: [#20, #50, #64, #53, #40] as #53 - ETERNITY (YUNG)
>
> APPRAISAL #5: The Three Guide Lines attain Center Perfection. (三綱得於
> 中極)
> Heaven makes its good fortune eternal. (天永厥福)
> FATHOMING #5: Eternal through the Three Guide Lines (三綱之永)
> MEANS: Their Way lasts forever. (其道長也)
>
> 
> <http://www.grapple369.com/images/Kabbalistic_Tree.jpg>
>
> APPRAISAL #6: The great presume good fortune eternal. (大永於福)
> Returning to an empty court, he enters (反虛庭)
> The great darkness he brought on himself. (入於酋冥)
> FATHOMING #6: In greatness, thinking good fortune eternal (大永於福)
> MEANS: Good fortune turns to ruin. (福反亡也)
>
> fú (福): 1. *GOOD* *FORTUNE*; happiness; luck, 2. Fujian, 3. *WINE*
> *AND* *MEAT* *USED* *IN* *CEREMONIAL* *OFFERINGS*
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:福>
>
> One might conclude that the STOICHEION of the KOSMOS consists of a #205
> = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE and if they are assigned 5 days x 81 = 405
> then there are 3 x #135 as AIR (#ALEPH / VAV: #6), WATER (#MEM / YOD:
> #10), FIRE (#SHIN / HE: #5) cf: Sefer Yetzirah 1:13; 3:4 and #135 -
> EARTH (HE / #702 [FEME: #135] / #343 [MALE: #135] - ʼerets (H776):
> EARTH) = #540 as JUPITER DEMIURGE with an ethereal fifth element #108 x
> 5 - AETHER being the #164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY.
>
> AIR (#ALEPH / VAV: #6 --> #457), WATER (#MEM / YOD: #10 --> #461), FIRE
> (#SHIN / HE: #5 --> #456) = #1374 as [#4, #70, #400, #30, #70, #800] =
> doulóō (G1402): {UMBRA: #1374 % #41 = #21} 1) *TO* *MAKE* *A* *SLAVE*
> *OF*, *REDUCE* *TO* *BONDAGE*; 2) metaphor: give myself wholly to one's
> needs and service, make myself a bondman to him;
>
> "EVEN SO WE, WHEN WE WERE CHILDREN, WERE IN *BONDAGE*-G1402 UNDER THE
> ELEMENTS-STOICHEION OF THE WORLD-KOSMOS:" [Galatians 4:3]
>
> #1374 + #456 = #1830 as [#400, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #300, #800,
> #50] = hypokritḗs (G5273): {UMBRA: #1188 % #41 = #40} 1) one who
> answers, an interpreter; 2) *AN* *ACTOR*, stage player; 3) a dissembler,
> pretender, *HYPOCRITE*
>
> "BUT WOE UNTO YOU, SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, *HYPOCRITES*-G5273! FOR YE
> SHUT UP THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN AGAINST MEN: FOR YE NEITHER GO IN
> YOURSELVES, NEITHER SUFFER YE THEM THAT ARE ENTERING TO GO IN." [Matthew
> 23:13]
>
> #8 - 𝌍幹 = #459
> COGITO: [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
>
> APPRAISAL #3: He gags his mouth with wood, (箝鍵)
> And bolts tight the lock. (挈挈)
> This is counter to propriety. (匪貞)
> FATHOMING #3: Gagged and bolted so tightly (箝鍵挈挈)
> MEANS: Seeking salary is perverse. (幹祿回也)
>
> lù (祿): 1. *GOOD* *FORTUNE*, 2. an official salary
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:祿>
>
> The religious movement of master ZHANG DAOLING (Zhāng Líng (張陵): Chang
> Ling; traditionally 34–156), who lived during the late Han period (206
> BCE–220 CE), is where the idea of three gods called “Celestial
> Functionaries” (sanguan 三官) came from. Heaven, Earth, and water were
> all administered by the three celestial ministers. The MINISTER OF
> HEAVEN (tianguan 天官) was thought to give prosperity; the MINISTER OF
> EARTH (diguan 地官) was thought to bring amnesty from punishment; and
> the MINISTER OF WATER (shuiguan 水官) was thought to deliver help in
> difficult circumstances.
>
> #42 - 𝌯迎 = #493
> COGITO: [#31, #21, #33, #80, #53] as #42 - GOING TO MEET (YING)
>
> APPRAISAL #2: The scaly dragon, plunging to the depths (蛟潛於淵)
> Induces its eggs on the heights to quicken. (陵卵化之)
> Though some men talk in darkness, (人或陰言)
> The Hundred Clans respond to them. (百姓和之)
> FATHOMING #2: Transformations by dragons in hiding (蛟潛之化)
> MEANS: The center essence is integrity. (中精誠也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:42>
>
> líng (陵): 1. mound; hill; mountain, 2. tomb, 3. to climb; to ascend, 4.
> to graze; to skim, 5. to traverse, 6. *ENCROACH* *ON*, 7. *TO* *BULLY*;
> *TO* *INSULT*, 8. severe; strict, 9. to decline, 10. to sharpen, 11. Ling
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:陵>
> #40 - 𝌭法 = #491
> COGITO: [#7, #78, #35, #80, #10] as #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA)
>
> APPRAISAL #7: If fine nets are cast on deep pools, (密綱離於淵)
> This does not benefit the fish. (不利於鱗)
> FATHOMING #7: Fine nets on deep pools (密綱離淵)
> MEANS: Tyrannical laws spread wider. (苛法張也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:40>
>
> zhāng (張): 1. a sheet; a leaf, 2. Zhang, 3. to open; to draw [a bow],
> 4. idea; thought, 5. to fix strings, 6. to unfold; to unroll; to
> stretch, 7. *TO* *BOAST*; *TO* *EXAGGERATE*, 8. to expand; to magnify,
> 9. *TO* *DISPLAY*; *TO* *EXHIBIT*; *TO* *PUBLISH*, 10. to catch animals
> with a net, 11. to spy on; to look, 12. large, 13. swollen, 14. Zhang
> [constellation], 15. to open a new business, 16. to fear
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:張>
>
> THOU THAT SAYEST A MAN SHOULD NOT COMMIT ADULTERY (ie. #65 - 𝍆內 = #516
> - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY), DOST THOU COMMIT ADULTERY? THOU THAT
> ABHORREST IDOLS, DOST THOU COMMIT SACRILEGE?
>
> THOU THAT MAKEST THY BOAST OF THE LAW, THROUGH BREAKING THE LAW
> DISHONOUREST THOU GOD (ʼâdôwn (H113): *THE* *LORD* *GOD*)?
>
> FOR THE NAME OF GOD (*YHWH*: #26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY)
> IS BLASPHEMED AMONG THE GENTILES THROUGH YOU, AS IT IS WRITTEN." [Romans
> 2:17-24]
>
> #449 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 10 FEBRUARY 2024 as [#5, #8, #30, #6,
> #400] /
> #508 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) as [#40,
> #8, #30, #30, #400] / [#8, #30, #30, #400, #40] = châlal (H2490):
> {UMBRA: #68 % #41 = #27} 1) to profane, defile, pollute, desecrate,
> begin; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to profane oneself, defile oneself, pollute
> oneself; i) ritually; ii) sexually; 1a2) to be polluted, be defiled; 1b)
> (Piel); 1b1) to profane, make common, defile, pollute; 1b2) to violate
> the honour of, dishonour; 1b3) *TO* *VIOLATE* (*A* *COVENANT*); 1b4)
> *TO* *TREAT* *AS* *COMMON*; 1c) (Pual) *TO* *PROFANE* (*NAME* *OF*
> *GOD*); 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to let be profaned; 1d2) to begin; 1e)
> (Hophal) to be begun; 2) to wound (fatally), bore through, pierce, bore;
> 2a) (Qal) to pierce; 2b) (Pual) to be slain; 2c) (Poel) to wound,
> pierce; 2d) (Poal) to be wounded; 3) (Piel) to play the flute or pipe;
>
> #57 - 𝌾守 = #508
> COGITO: [#48, #7, #28, #57, #49] as #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)
>
> [#48 {@1: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#48); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#48)}
> #7 {@2: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#103); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#55)}
> #28 {@3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#105); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#83)}
> #57 {@4: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#164); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU
> (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16})}
> #49] {@5: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
> SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#189)}
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:57>
>
> TELOS TOTAL: #189 as [#1, #80, #100, #8] = pâqach (H6491): {UMBRA: #188
> % #41 = #24} 1) *TO* *OPEN* (*THE* *EYES*); 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to open (the
> eyes); 1a2) to open (the ears); 1b) (Niphal) to be opened;
>
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #331
>
> #515 = #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY + #64 - SINKING (CH'EN) as [#5,
> #400, #50, #10, #700] /
> #1080 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #189 as [#20, #400, #50, #10, #600] =
> tannîyn (H8577): {UMBRA: #510 % #41 = #18} 1) *DRAGON*, serpent, sea
> monster; 1a) dragon or dinosaur; 1b) sea or river monster; 1c) serpent,
> venomous snake;
>
> #567 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #331 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10,
> #50, #6] = tsâbâʼ (H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes
> forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised
> army); 1a2) host (of angels); 1a3) *OF* *SUN*, *MOON*, *AND* *STARS*;
> 1a4) of whole creation; 1b) war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c)
> service;
>
> #97 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #191 as [#6, #5, #1, #30, #5, #10, #40] =
> ʼĕlôhîym (H430): {UMBRA: #86 % #41 = #4} 1) (plural); 1a) rulers,
> judges; 1b) divine ones; 1c) angels; 1d) gods; 2) (plural intensive -
> singular meaning); 2a) god, goddess; 2b) godlike one; 2c) *WORKS* *OR*
> *SPECIAL* *POSSESSIONS* *OF* *GOD*; 2d) the (true) God; 2e) God;
>
> "FOR *GOD*-H430 IS MY KING OF OLD, WORKING SALVATION IN THE MIDST OF THE
> EARTH. THOU DIDST DIVIDE THE SEA BY THY STRENGTH: THOU BRAKEST THE HEADS
> OF THE *DRAGONS*-H8577 IN THE WATERS. THOU BRAKEST THE HEADS OF
> LEVIATHAN IN PIECES, AND GAVEST HIM TO BE MEAT TO THE PEOPLE INHABITING
> THE WILDERNESS." [Psalm 74:12-14]
> 
>
> #496 as [#40, #30, #20, #6, #400] / [#40, #30, #20, #400, #6] /
> #508 as [#6, #40, #30, #20, #6, #400, #6] = malkûwth (H4438): {UMBRA:
> #496 % #41 = #4} 1) *ROYALTY*, *ROYAL* *POWER*, *REIGN*, *KINGDOM*,
> *SOVEREIGN* *POWER*; 1a) royal power, *DOMINION*; 1b) reign; 1c)
> kingdom, realm;
>
> THE DRAGON KING, ALSO KNOWN AS THE DRAGON GOD: Is a Chinese water and
> weather god. He is regarded as the dispenser of rain as well as the
> zoomorphic representation of the yang masculine power of generation. He
> is the collective personification of the ancient concept of the lóng in
> Chinese culture.
>
> He can take a variety of forms, the most important ones being the
> cosmological Sihai Longwang (四海龍王 "Dragon King of the Four Seas")
> who, with the addition of the Yellow Dragon (黃龍 Huánglóng) of
> Xuanyuan, represent the watery and chthonic forces presided over by the
> Five Forms of the Highest Deity (五方上帝 Wǔfāng Shàngdì), or their
> zoomorphic incarnation. One of his epithets is Dragon King of Wells and
> Springs. The dragon king is the king of the dragons and he also controls
> all of the creatures in the sea. The dragon king gets his orders from
> the Jade Emperor. [ref: Wikipedia : Dragon_King]
>
> HEAD: YIN guards the door; YANG guards the gate. No things make contact.
> (陰守戶。陽守門。物莫相干)
>
> Yin guards what is relatively inside; yang takes care of what is
> comparatively outside. Thus, yin may be said to keep watch over earth,
> while yang watches Heaven. Since yin and yang are each at their separate
> stations, apparently defending their own territories, there can be no
> mutual contact. With the marvellous capacity for interaction lost to the
> myriad things, no thing can germinate or grow.
> APPRAISAL #1: Shut the double windows (閉朋牖)
> To guard first possessions. (守元有)
> FATHOMING #1: Shutting the double windows (閉朋牖)
> MEANS: He is good at keeping what he has. (善持有也)
>
> shǒu (守): 1. to defend; to protect; to guard; to keep safe, 2. to watch
> over, 3. *TO* *OBSERVE*; *TO* *ABIDE* *BY*, 4. to be near; to be close
> to, 5. Governor, 6. duty; an official post, 7. *PERSONAL* *INTEGRITY*;
> *MORAL* *CHARACTER*, 8. Shou, 9. to preserve; to conserve, 10. to wait
> for, 11. to rely on, 12. to hunt
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&glyph:守>
>
> Since Appraisal 1 refers to the Beginning of Thought, the "double
> windows" most likely refer to the eyes and ears as primary vehicles for
> sensory contact with the outside world. In general, Han philosophy does
> not celebrate denial of the senses for its own sake. At the same time,
> many texts recognize that sensation seeking deters one from reverent
> attention to social duty. Driven by desire, a person "is agitated, with
> his thoughts helter-skelter." One classical text says:
>
> The people are born good. It is because of [desires for] external things
> that they change. If this is so, then to preserve Man's original
> potential for Goodness, the individual must learn to lessen desire. The
> good man keeps unnecessary distractions at bay, the better to dedicate
> himself to pursuit of the Way. Three commentators read the poem quite
> differently. The windows stand for ways to view the world outside. That
> the windows are double suggests "factionalism among friends." Thus the
> good official, if he is to remain principled, must avoid viewing the
> world through the biases of his faction...
>
> APPRAISAL #9: Joining the white-haired in their principles, (輿荼有守)
> He rejects the young with their coal-black hair. (辭于盧首)
> He is not in danger. (不殆)
> FATHOMING #9: Joining the aged in having principles (輿荼有守)
> MEANS: The old excel the new. (故愈新也)
>
> #1236 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #331 as [#5, #30, #1, #200, #200, #800] /
> #1286 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #331 as [#5, #30, #1, #200, #200, #800,
> #50] = elássōn (G1640): {UMBRA: #1286 % #41 = #15} 1) less; 1a) *IN*
> *AGE* (*YOUNGER*); 1b) in rank; 1c) *IN* *EXCELLENCE*, *WORSE*;
>
> #1045 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #331 as [#9, #5, #100, #1, #80, #800, #50]
> = therápōn (G2324): {UMBRA: #1045 % #41 = #20} 1) an *ATTENDANT*,
> *SERVANT*: *OF* *GOD*; 1a) spoken of Moses discharging the duties
> committed to him by God;
>
> "AND MOSES VERILY WAS FAITHFUL IN ALL HIS HOUSE, AS A *SERVANT*-G2324,
> FOR A TESTIMONY OF THOSE THINGS WHICH WERE TO BE SPOKEN AFTER; BUT
> CHRIST AS A SON OVER HIS OWN HOUSE; WHOSE HOUSE ARE WE, IF WE HOLD FAST
> THE CONFIDENCE AND THE REJOICING OF THE HOPE FIRM UNTO THE END.
>
> WHEREFORE (AS THE HOLY GHOST SAITH, TO DAY IF YE WILL HEAR HIS VOICE,
> HARDEN NOT YOUR HEARTS, AS IN THE PROVOCATION, IN THE DAY OF TEMPTATION
> IN THE WILDERNESS..." [Hebrews 3:7-8]
>
> In China, men of experience tend to be valued over strapping youths. One
> chapter of the Documents has a wise ruler saying: Henceforth I shall
> take advice from the aged and then be free from error. Those
> white-haired officers whose physical strength is failing, I would
> rather have. Those dashing brave officers, who are faultless in shooting
> and charioteering, I would rather not have." [CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY
> by Yang HSIUNG 4 BCE, Translation and Commentary by Michael NYLAN 1993,
> p 341, 343]
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:12>
>
> #12 - 𝌑童 = #463 - PRINCIPLE OF EMANATION
> COGITO: [#6, #53, #70, #69, #59] as #12 - YOUTHFULNESS (T'UNG)
>
> APPRAISAL #5: If in thick brush he seeks the ssu, (蒙柴求兕)
> He finds a prize less valued. (其得不美)
> FATHOMING #5: Hunting the ssu in the brush (蒙柴求兕)
> MEANS: The catch is not worth the praise. (得不慶也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:17>
>
> #17 - 𝌖䎡 = #468 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE
> COGITO: [#13, #63, #64, #1, #4] as #17 - HOLDING BACK (JUAN)
>
> APPRAISAL #5: The golden mushroom does not grow. (黃菌不誕)
> It awaits the propitious cloud. (俟于慶雲)
> FATHOMING #5: That mushrooms of immortality do not grow (黃菌不誕)
> MEANS: They wait to be joined by their mates. (俟求耦也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:26>
>
> #26 - 𝌟務 = #477 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY
> COGITO: [#23, #48, #36, #81, #54] as #26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU)
>
> APPRAISAL #2: Seeking for himself the new and fresh, (新鮮自求)
> Its fragrance pure, refined, and rare— (珍潔精其芳)
> Such is the conduct of the noble man. (君子攸行)
> FATHOMING #2: For himself, seeking the new and fresh (新鮮自求)
> MEANS: Light and glory suffuse the self. (光於已也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:65>
>
> #65 - 𝍆內 = #516 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
> COGITO: [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
>
> APPRAISAL #1: Careful about consorts: (謹于媐求九)
> To be chaste at first (初貞)
> Makes for later peace. (後寧)
> FATHOMING #1: Careful about his consorts (謹於媐求九)
> MEANS: He begins with women of proven worth. (治女政也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:66>
>
> #66 - 𝍇去 = #517 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENCE
> COGITO: [#57, #17, #17, #69, #62] as #66 - DEPARTURE (CH'U)
>
> APPRAISAL #9: He seeks me with no success (求我不得)
> Since my turn to the northwest. (自我西北)
> FATHOMING #9: Seeking, but not getting me (求我不得)
> MEANS: How can it last long? (安可久也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:71>
>
> #71 - 𝍌止 = #522 - OBLIGATING NORM APPRAISAL
> COGITO: [#80, #24, #34, #74, #64] as #71 - STOPPAGE (CHIH)
>
> APPRAISAL #4: They stop at saplings (止于童木)
> To seek their luxuriant fruits. (求其疏穀)
> FATHOMING #4: Stopping by young trees (止于童木)
> MEANS: Theirs is a fruitless search. (其求窮也)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:76>
>
> #76 - 𝍑劇 = #527 - MANIFESTING NORM APPRAISAL
> COGITO: [#46, #59, #39, #76, #2] as #76 - AGGRAVATION (CHU)
>
> APPRAISAL #6: The Four States prosper. (四國滿斯)
> He is their home. (宅)
> FATHOMING #6: That the States fill his realm (四國滿斯)
> MEANS: They seek a safe home. (求安宅也)
>
> The other caveat which we make concerning international media services
> such as AL JAZEERA which doesn’t have any grounding of DEMOCRACY as the
> basis for its news reporting, is then the CHINESE WHISPERS PRINCIPLE
> whereby usage of the term has been defended as being similar to other
> expressions such as "It's all Greek to me" and "Double Dutch". Although
> YUNTE HUANG, a professor of English at the University of California,
> Santa Barbara, has said that: "Indicating inaccurately transmitted
> information, the expression 'CHINESE WHISPERS' carries with it a sense
> of paranoia caused by espionage, counterespionage, Red Scare, and other
> war games, real or imaginary, cold or hot."
>
> 
> <https://x.com/bbcnews/status/1755856617336193050>
>
Thusly our focus is not on the modality of any particular journalist
> such as TUCKER CARLSON’s forthcoming interview with RUSSIAN PRESIDENT
> VLADIMIR PUTIN irrespective of any comrade endorsement from CHINESE
> PRESIDENT XI JINPING, but rather the subtle unconscious and voluntary
> divulging of what is the true nature to any preconceived perception as
> it’s ENTENTE CHARACTERISTIC (eg: does the journalist really believe
> their own word sculpture, whether its just a contrivance or an artifice
> as dance of indecency)…
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?idea:463,468,477,516,517,522,527,515,525,496,519>
>
> We after all have 11 RULES and this is just 1933 fiction isn’t it?
>
> #74 - 𝍏䦯 = #525
> COGITO: [#66, #5, #61, #55, #22] as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:260&feme:209&deme:208&idea:209>
>
> #76 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #208 as [#1, #4, #6, #50, #10, #5] /
> #116 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #208 as [#1, #4, #6, #50, #10, #5, #40] =
> ʼâdôwn (H113): {UMBRA: #61 % #41 = #20} 1) firm, strong, lord, master;
> 1a) lord, master; 1a1) reference to men; i) *SUPERINTENDENT* *OF*
> *HOUSEHOLD*, *OF* *AFFAIRS*; ii) master; iii) king; 1a2) reference to
> God; i) the Lord God; ii) Lord of the whole earth; 1a3) lords, kings; i)
> reference to men; 1) proprietor of hill of Samaria; 2) master; 3)
> husband; 4) prophet; 5) governor; 6) prince; 7) king; ii) reference to
> God; 1) Lord of lords (probably = 'thy husband, Yahweh'); iii) my lord,
> my master; 1) reference to men; 11) master; 12) husband; 13) prophet;
> 14) prince; 15) king; 16) father; 17) Moses; 18) priest; 19) theophanic
> angel; 110) captain; 111) general recognition of superiority; 2)
> reference to God; 21) my Lord, my Lord and my God; 22) Adonai (parallel
> with Yahweh);
>
> #64 - 𝍅沈 = #515
> COGITO: [#65, #65, #64, #21, #9] as #64 - SINKING (CH'EN)
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?male:261&feme:224&ontic:241&idea:224>
>
> #1030 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #261 as [#20, #300, #70, #30, #10, #600] =
> shûwʻâl (H7776): {UMBRA: #406 % #41 = #37} 1) *FOX*, a burrower; 1a)
> fox; 1b) perhaps also jackal;
>
> "WHEN ONCE THE *MASTER* *OF* *THE* *HOUSE* IS RISEN UP, AND HATH *SHUT*
> TO THE *DOOR*, AND YE BEGIN TO STAND WITHOUT, AND TO KNOCK AT THE
> *DOOR*, SAYING, LORD, LORD, OPEN UNTO US; AND HE SHALL ANSWER AND SAY
> UNTO YOU, I KNOW YOU NOT WHENCE YE ARE:
>
> YOUTUBE: “THE KILLERS - HUMAN (OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO)”
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIZdjT1472Y>
>
> THE SAME DAY THERE CAME CERTAIN OF THE PHARISEES, SAYING UNTO HIM, GET
> THEE OUT, AND DEPART HENCE: FOR HEROD WILL KILL THEE. AND HE SAID UNTO
> THEM, GO YE, AND TELL THAT *FOX*, BEHOLD, I CAST OUT *DEVILS*, AND I DO
> CURES TO DAY AND TO MORROW, AND THE THIRD DAY I SHALL BE PERFECTED."
> [Luke 13:25, 31-32]
>
> GARFIELD JP (@GarfieldUtd) @ 1831 HOURS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: "Just when
> you think #PUTIN couldn't get any more brilliant...he tells us why he
> doesn't call Biden and exposes NATO for intimidating and extorting their
> own people with made-up threats 🙄 But hey, if the US really wants to
> stop fighting, maybe stop giving weapons to Ukraine? Just a thought. And
> don't worry, NATO, Putin says you're just scaring your own citizens with
> imaginary boogeymen from Russia. Because we all know Russia is just a
> big ol' teddy bear 🐻 #TuckerCarlson"
> <https://x.com/garfieldutd/status/1755856899751182840>
>
> Our consideration concerning the notion of CHINESE WHISPERS PRINCIPLE
> are that speech analysis which then produces aggregations of the neural
> linguistic pragma by which especially our objective SEPTET COGITO [#12,
> #17, #26, #65, #66, #71, #76] APPRAISALS are applied to the speech
> dynamic will hypothetically grant a pre-eminent discernment which is
> then a requisite metalogic weighting criteria for the journalistic
> postulation of rules such as GRUMBLE (#182, #333)@[12, 12, 29, 17, 55,
> 26, 39, 65, 24, 66, 14, 71, 9, 76] that are foundational essentials for
> any trustworthy knowledge and information economy.
>
> {@7: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
> OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#333)}
>
> ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #541
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417
>
> #900 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #333 as [#300, #400, #80, #70, #50] = týpos
> (G5179): {UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) the mark of a stroke or blow,
> print; 2) a figure formed by a blow or impression; 2a) of a figure or
> image; 2b) of the image of the gods; 3) form; 3a) *THE* *TEACHING*
> *WHICH* *EMBODIES* *THE* *SUM* *AND* *SUBSTANCE* *OF* *RELIGION* *AND*
> *REPRESENTS* *IT* *TO* *THE* *MIND*, *MANNER* *OF* *WRITING*, *THE*
> *CONTENTS* *AND* *FORM* *OF* *A* *LETTER*; 4) an example; 4a) in the
> technical sense, the pattern in conformity to which a thing must be
> made; 4b) in an ethical sense, a dissuasive example, a pattern of
> warning; 4b1) of ruinous events which serve as admonitions or warnings
> to others; 4c) an example to be imitated; 4c1) of men worthy of
> imitation; 4d) in a doctrinal sense; 4d1) of a type i.e. a person or
> thing prefiguring a future (Messianic) person or thing;
>
> #456 - ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #541 as [#5, #80, #5, #10, #100, #1, #200,
> #5, #50] = peirázō (G3985): {UMBRA: #1003 % #41 = #19} 1) to try whether
> a thing can be done; 1a) to attempt, endeavour; 2) *TO* *TRY*, *MAKE*
> *TRIAL* *OF*, *TEST*: *FOR* *THE* *PURPOSE* *OF* *ASCERTAINING* *HIS*
> *QUANTITY*, *OR* *WHAT* *HE* *THINKS*, *OR* *HOW* *HE* *WILL* *BEHAVE*
> *HIMSELF*; 2a) in a good sense; 2b) in a bad sense, to test one
> maliciously, craftily to put to the proof his feelings or judgments; 2c)
> to try or test one's faith, virtue, character, by enticement to sin;
> 2c1) to solicit to sin, to tempt; i) of the *TEMPTATIONS* *OF* *THE*
> *DEVIL*; 2c2) after the OT usage; i) of God: to inflict evils upon one
> in order to prove his character and the steadfastness of his faith; ii)
> men are said to tempt God by exhibitions of distrust, as though they
> wished to try whether he is not justly distrusted; iii) by impious or
> wicked conduct to test God's justice and patience, and to challenge him,
> as it were to give proof of his perfections.;
>
> #451 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #182 as [#400, #20, #30, #1] = kâlâʼ
> (H3607): {UMBRA: #51 % #41 = #10} 1) to restrict, restrain, withhold,
> shut up, keep back, refrain, forbid; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) *TO* *SHUT* *UP*;
> 1a2) to restrain; 1a3) to withhold; 1b) (Niphal) to be restrained; 1c)
> (Piel) to finish;
>
> #944 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #417 as [#4, #30, #400, #10, #500] = deleth
> (H1817): {UMBRA: #434 % #41 = #24} 1) *DOOR*, gate; 1a) a door; 1b) a
> gate; 1c) (fig.); 1c1) of chest lid; 1c2) of crocodile jaws; 1c3) of
> doors of the heavens; 1c4) of an easily-accessible woman;
>
> SEE ALSO: "FINAL SOLUTION ON AMERICAN CHRISTO-FASCISM (ANTI-CHRIST)"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Refutation%20of%20Religio-Fascism.pdf>
>
> DOLF @ 1826 HOURS ON 8 FEBRUARY 2024: “You are correct Michael its a
> waste of time responding to you ...
>
> YOUR GOSPEL DOESN'T MEASURE TO THIS: "Now to him that is of power to
> establish you ACCORDING TO MY GOSPEL, AND THE PREACHING OF JESUS CHRIST,
> ACCORDING TO THE REVELATION OF THE MYSTERY, WHICH WAS KEPT SECRET SINCE
> THE WORLD BEGAN, BUT NOW IS MADE MANIFEST, and by the scriptures of the
> prophets, according to the COMMANDMENT OF THE EVERLASTING GOD, made
> known to all nations for the obedience of faith: To God only wise, be
> glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen." [Romans 16:25-27]
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1826 HOURS ON 8 FEBRUARY 2024: “Obviously
> not. The Lord Jesus Christ is not fake, but everything else is!
>
> There is only life in Him, everything else is already dead.
>
> Please pay attention.”
>
> DOLF @ 1339 HOURS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: “Stop with the gibber Michael,
> we've since as elucidated by our GOSPEL OF IMAGO DEI / ELOHIM,
> subsequently devised a MORAL CODE for MACHINE INTELLIGENCE and you are
> now shut out forever …”
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1455 HOURS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: “You dickhead
> thickhead. All you have done is shut yourself into the fake forever.
>
> So, you just continue trying to change the world, the dead, that will
> never change.”
>
> DOLF @ 1709 HOURS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: “Plenty of opportunity to refute
> the accompanying evidence which substantiates the assertions.
>
> I don’t adhere to your cult of the phallus which is blasphemous.”
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1839 HRS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: "This is
> shocking news that you don't adhere. I hope I can get over it, ye
> *GRAPPLING* wankerous gerbilologist verbalologist.
>
> Pointless on in worldly fakeness then.
>
> And you are one who worship in the cult of the phallus, Buddy."
>
> DOLF @ 2035 HOURS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: "It is now the Sabbath hours with
> sunset and what better time to convey that your habitual lack of
> comprehension and knowingly false statements are due to your being given
> to CHRIST MURDEROUS #666 - PAGAN IDOLATRY.
>
> "BEING FILLED WITH ALL UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, FORNICATION, WICKEDNESS,
> COVETOUSNESS, MALICIOUSNESS; FULL OF ENVY, MURDER, DEBATE, DECEIT,
> MALIGNITY; WHISPERERS, BACKBITERS, HATERS OF GOD, DESPITEFUL, PROUD,
> BOASTERS, INVENTORS OF EVIL THINGS, DISOBEDIENT TO PARENTS, WITHOUT
> UNDERSTANDING, COVENANT-BREAKERS, WITHOUT NATURAL AFFECTION, IMPLACABLE,
> UNMERCIFUL: WHO KNOWING THE JUDGMENT OF GOD, THAT THEY WHICH COMMIT SUCH
> THINGS ARE WORTHY OF DEATH, NOT ONLY DO THE SAME, BUT HAVE PLEASURE IN
> THEM THAT DO THEM." [Romans 1:29-32]
>
> SEE ALSO: "DALEK PRODUCTION LINE CONSCIOUSNESS: ON ART AND THE AESTHETIC
> OF AWE -- IS IT IMITATION (mimesis) OR SUCCEEDING (diádochos)?"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Dalek%20Revival.pdf>
>
> Have you any WHITE MISSIONARY advice for the LOST CHRISTO-FASCIST SOULS
> of Africa?"
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 2108 HRS ON 9 FEBRUARY 2024: "All I get is
> crap from you sinner Christians! [The] Sabbath can't and won't save
> you, you silly ignorant fellow. If you don't even know that by now, what
> hope is there? NO RULE, OR LAW, OR BIBLE ORDINANCE, any or all, cannot
> make you righteous, cannot save a man!
>
> You were given an opportunity to see, or even just think about, the
> utter vanity of pursuing justice in the world - something you have done
> for years and years and years.
>
> It... is... a... fantasy... vanity. You can't get righteousness out of
> fake!
>
> Something you are not going to see till the day you die, it seems.”
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:81>
>
> #81 - 𝍖養 = #532
> COGITO: [#72, #63, #75, #4, #81] as #81 - FOSTERING (YANG)
>
> APPRAISAL #9: Like the fixed stars, like the Year, (星如歲如)
> Return and continue at the start. (複繼之初)
> FATHOMING #9: The stars and the Year Star (星如歲如)
> MEANS: At the end, they foster beginnings. (終養始也)
>
> xīng (星): 1. *A* *STAR*; *A* *PLANET*, 2. Xing, 3. traveling at high
> speed, 4. a celebrity, 5. a spark, 6. a point of light, 7. markings on a
> balance arm, 8. small; minute, 9. star-white, 10. numerous and scattered
> everywhere
>
> DOLF @ 2118 HOURS ON YEAR OF THE DRAGON / LUNAR NEW YEAR OF 9 FEBRUARY
> 2024: "To the Jew first and also to the Greek who is indebted to the
> barbarian...
>
> So what we have here is that you are a #666 - PAGAN PHALLUS IDOLATROUS
> CHRISTO-FASCIST who is making irrational claims against my JEWISH /
> CHRISTIAN EVERLASTING COVENANT with GOD.
>
> What advantage has the Jew?
>
> "MUCH EVERY WAY: CHIEFLY, BECAUSE THAT UNTO THEM WERE *COMMITTED* *THE*
> *ORACLES* *OF* *GOD*. FOR WHAT IF SOME DID NOT BELIEVE?
>
> SHALL THEIR UNBELIEF MAKE THE FAITH OF GOD WITHOUT EFFECT?" [Romans 3:1-3]
>
> You are not just a person in a delusional state but your religious
> assertions exhibit a psychosis which has gone on for decades.
>
> I don't think I should entertain your depravity any further.”
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 0728 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "1) There is no
> Jew or Gentile.
>
> 2) You are the phallus worshiper. {@2: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#33);
> Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#48)}
>
> 3) You can't win because you are a sinner Christian, a fake." {@4: Sup:
> 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#91 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%1}); Ego: 33 -
> CLOSENESS: MI (#92)}
>
> DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #91
>
> #116 - DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #91 as [#2, #5, #1, #2, #100, #6] = ʼâbaq
> (H79): {UMBRA: #103 % #41 = #21} 1) (Niphal) to wrestle, *GRAPPLE* (get
> dusty), bedust;
>
> #28 - MALE CHECKSUM TOTAL: #91 as [#5, #8, #9, #1, #5] = chaṭṭâʼ
> (H2400): {UMBRA: #18 % #41 = #18} 1) *SINNERS*; 2) sinful; 3) exposed to
> condemnation, reckoned as offenders;
>
> #416 - FEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #92 as [#5, #400, #5, #6] = tôhûw (H8414):
> {UMBRA: #411 % #41 = #1} 1) formlessness, confusion, unreality,
> emptiness; 1a) formlessness (of primeval earth); 1a1) nothingness, empty
> space; 1b) *THAT* *WHICH* *IS* *EMPTY* *OR* *UNREAL* (*OF* *IDOLS*)
> (fig); 1c) wasteland, wilderness (of solitary places); 1d) place of
> chaos; 1e) vanity;
>
> — JESUS LOVES EVEN ME —
>
> "NOT ANOTHER JESUS JANGLER.
> FROM AN AFRICAN BACKWATER.
> AND A CIVIL RIGHTS WRANGLER.
> WITH A MANTRA OF SLAUGHTER.
>
> IN THIS THE LAND OF THE FREE.
> BY A COTTON PICKER'S HANDS.
> EMANCIPATED FROM SLAVERY.
> BETRAYS LIBERTY'S DEMANDS."
>
> DOLF @ 1132 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "I detect more slander by just
> three lines as a guide for attaining the center of perfection.
>
> No I'm a #983 - Philólogos (G5378): *LOVER* *OF* *THE* *WORD* = #33 -
> CLOSENESS (MI) + #48 - RITUAL (LI) + #902 (#451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
> x 2) - archḗ (G746): *FIRST* *PRINCIPLES* / Pharisaîos (G5330):
> *OPPOSITION* *TO* *ROMAN* / *CATHOLIC* *RULE* and the latter as JEWISH
> of which the APOSTLE PAUL was a proponent, practices circumcision which
> is a rejection of phallus or MARRIAGE / #1827 - EUCHARIST IDOLATROUS
> WORSHIP, whilst being a Jewish / Gentile Christian I do not engage in
> such #48 - RITUAL (LI) AS #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) practices.
>
> However on that question, I provide an opinion of some 58 pages which
> substantiates my sapient religious belief in conforming to that of the
> JEWISH / GENTILE CHRISTIANS of that era.
>
> Do cease your CHRISTO-FASCIST ANTI-SEMITISM for we will not cast what is
> sacred to the profane whether yourself or AFRICANS as JESUS JANGLERS
> like KANYE WEST."
>
> SEE ALSO: "INFORMAL RESEARCH NOTES ON JERUSALEM COUNCIL 50 CE CONFORMING
> TO COGITO ARRAY AS IMAGO DEI WHICH BEING AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS NOT
> THEN ANY PROVIDENCE OF THE PAPAL AUTHORITY / ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH"
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Notes%20on%20Jerusalem%20Council%2020240119.pdf>
>
> MICHAEL [TIN MAN] CHRIST @ 1211 HRS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Nothing, you
> detect nothing that does not centre itself on thy will be done.
>
> A typical sinner Christian."
>
> DOLF @ 1317 HOURS ON 10 FEBRUARY 2024: "Thy will be done?
>
> Is that a MORAL, IMMORAL or an AMORAL will and can it be codified:
>
> "MAKEST THY BOAST OF GOD, AND KNOWEST HIS WILL, AND APPROVEST THE THINGS
> THAT ARE MORE EXCELLENT, BEING INSTRUCTED OUT OF THE LAW (ie. shǒu fǎ
> (守法): TO ABIDE BY THE LAW AS COGITO #57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU) - 𝌾守 =
> #508 / #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491) ..." [Romans 2:17-18]
>
> Your reprobate response is irrational."
>
> A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:
>
> <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Gnosis%20Ex%20Machina%20Moral%20Code.pdf>
>
> Revision Date: 9 February 2024
>
--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)