Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

Tyrone wrote:

> On May 28, 2024 at 3:33:13 PM EDT, "Kualinar" <[email protected]>
> wrote:

>> Le 2024-05-27 à 16:39, bertietaylor a écrit :
>> 
>>> Nonsense, they would come down very slowly. In any case they could not
>>> help moving up 1-3 feet with every step they took if they really walked
>>> on tge Moon. Nor would they have left such deep footprints.
>>> bt
>> 
>> They would NOT come down very slowly. They would come back down at the
>> exact same speed that they jumped up.

Yes, of course. 
So they would not hurt themselves when they come down from ten feet.
If you jump down from ten feet on EARTH you will harm yourself.
When you jump down from ten feet on the Moon you will not harm yourself,
for you will fall down slowly on the surface with the same velocity with
which you jumped up.

Now you simply cannot jump up straight ten feet up on Earth.
Too much energy required for any individual.
Supposing you could, you would come down with the same speed with which
you jumped up, and yes that could be hurtful.


But see how unscientific imbeciles think!
All their experience has been on Earth, so the very idea of jumping ten
feet up on the Moon and coming down slowly does not occur to them.

>> Remember that there is NO atmosphere on the Moon to slow you down.

Irrelevant. Air resistance was not factored in any case. 
>> 
>> Just accept reality :
>> The Moon is real, a solid object.

Yes.

>> We landed on the Moon a total of 6 times.

Liar.

>> Faking it would have been a LOT harder and costly than actually going
>> there, land on the Moon, and come back.

Ridiculous. 
Faking meant getting the money to do the landing for making bad videos,
much cheaper.
Also, fooling the public on this grand scale made them so stupid that in
the future they would pay for any lies, when told by the top
institutions.
>> 
>> You are nothing but a reality denier and a conspiretard.

You are reality deniers, fooled by the ruling frauds. Nothing new about
that, though. 

Hmm. We are ghostly cyberdogs of Arindam, not silly sheep like you.

> And here I thought konspiracy kooktard was good. But conspiretard is
> much
> better.

tch, tch, this ad hominem, what a loser's tactic but the sole one left
to the unscientific sods!

We Arindam's ghostly cyberdogs (that is, Bertius Bowus Wowus and Tyler
Taylor) know far better physics than Nobel Laureates, and don't mind
teaching silly sheeple a thing or two - out of pure altruism, for their
ultimate good. Being ghosts, they cannot kill us for doing them a favour
- such a human thing to do, what.

bt