Re: Why the moon landing was a hoax - no jumps!

bertietaylor wrote:

> a425couple wrote:

>> On 5/20/24 22:32, bertietaylor wrote:
>>> Kualinar wrote:
>>>> Le 2024-05-14 à 04:59, bertietaylor a écrit :
>>>>> Kualinar wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2024-05-13 à 03:08, bertietaylor a écrit :
>>>>>>> R Kym Horsell wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In alt.astronomy bertietaylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Kualinar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 2024-05-12 ?? 20:04, bertietaylor a ??crit??:
>>>>>>>>>>> They never went there.
>>>>>>>>>>> bt
>>>>>>>>>> Are you a flatard or one of those stupid Moon landing denier ?
>>>>>>>>> Am a ghostly cyberdog that cannot think why they did not jump up 
>>>>>>>>> ten feet.
>>>>>>>>> - typically unconvincing bs snipped -
>>>>>>>>> bt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your calculations are wrong.
>>>>>>>> The avg astronaught weighs around 110 lb.
>>>>>>>

>> I am convinced that the USA did send multiple missions with
>> American astronauts that landed on the moon and returned.

> Politics trumps not physics.
> It is very different on the Moon.
> The evidence is that the landings were faked.

>> We were in a very competitive race with the USSR (Russia)
>> and we won.  USSR was watching very closely for this
>> big public relations event.  They would have denounced
>> the news if they could have, but they saw the landing was
>> real.

> They had the lowest opinions of Americans so why bother to comment.
> Anyway it could be a blackmail opportunity. Give us this and we won't
> tell. 
> In India there was tension. The local Muslims were upset as the Moon
> had
> been defiled. Then someone told them it was fake so they stopped in
> their rioting.

> bt



>> Telescopes have gotten so good that we have pictures
>> of those landing sites and the left behind debris and
>> the astronauts tracks and footprints.

Wow. If true I must be wrong but in these days of CGI anything can be
manufactured digitally and passed off as the purest reality.

bt