Re: 65-year-old whore Madonna sued for 'pornography without warning' at LA concert performance

On Fri, 31 May 2024 11:36:15 -0700, Vapid Vagina Carriers
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Madonna has been sued by a concertgoer at her Celebration world tour, 
>who alleges that Madonna produced “pornography without warning” and he 
>“was forced to watch topless women on stage simulating sex acts”.
>
>In the lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Los Angeles and seen by the 
>Guardian, the plaintiff, Justen Lipeles, makes a series of allegations 
>regarding her 7 March concert at the Kia Forum venue in the city. The 
>concert’s promoter, Live Nation, is named alongside Madonna as a defendant.
>
>Lipeles bought four tickets at $500 (£390) each, which stated that the 
>concert would start at 8.30pm. Lipeles’ lawsuit complains that the 
>concert actually began at 10pm, claiming: “Defendants did not provide 
>any notice to plaintiff that the concert will start at a later time.”
>
>The lawsuit continues: “The temperature inside the Kia Forum was 
>uncomfortably hot as required by Madonna who refused to allow the air 
>conditioning to be turned on.” Lipeles was duly “profusely sweating and 
>became physically ill as a result of the heat. When fans complained 
>about the heat, Madonna unreasonably told them to take their clothes off.
>
>“Further, during most of the performance it was apparent to plaintiff 
>that Madonna was lip-syncing.
>
>“During the performance plaintiff was forced to watch topless women on 
>stage simulating sex acts. Plaintiff felt like he was watching a 
>pornographic film being made.”
>
>Lipeles is suing for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, 
>unfair competition, false advertising and emotional distress.
>
>Regarding the latter, the lawsuit says Madonna’s actions were 
>“intentional, extreme and outrageous”, and “such actions were done with 
>the intent to cause serious emotional distress or with reckless 
>disregard of the probability of causing … serious emotional distress”.
>
>Lipeles is calling for compensatory damages, along with his legal costs 
>and a refund for the concert tickets.
>
>Madonna and Live Nation have not commented on the lawsuit. The Guardian 
>has contacted representatives of each for comment.
>
>The case has echoes of another lawsuit from earlier in the Celebration 
>tour run.
>
>In January, New Yorkers Michael Fellows and Jonathan Hadden sued Madonna 
>for a late start – but not any alleged pornography – at her 13 December 
>concert at Brooklyn’s Barclays Center. After Madonna began the concert 
>at 10.30pm, the pair said they were “left stranded” after leaving at 
>1am, and the lateness interfered with the following day when they “had 
>to get up early to go to work”.
>
>A statement by Madonna and Live Nation said they would “defend this case 
>vigorously”, saying that the late start was due to a technical issue.
>
>Madonna previously faced lawsuits in 2019 and 2020 complaining of her 
>lateness during the Madame X tour, both of which were dismissed.
>
>Despite the disgruntlement of Lipeles, Fellows and Hadden, the 
>Celebration tour has been well-received by critics and audiences, with 
>the Guardian’s Alexis Petridis writing in a four-star review that her 
>“strengths seem very strong indeed”.
>
>After 80 dates and $225m in ticket revenue, the tour concluded with a 
>free concert on Copacabana beach in Rio de Janeiro for an estimated 1.6 
>million people.
>
>https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/may/31/madonna-sued-for-pornography-without-warning-at-la-concert-performance
>
>Madonna offers concertgoers oral sex in exchange for Clinton vote
>
>https://globalnews.ca/video/3013462/madonna-offers-concertgoers-oral-sex-in-exchange-for-clinton-vote
>

The plaintiff has a 100% chance of being a flaming homosexual