Re: [APC-DEV] IS_INTERNED for apc + zend mixtures
[email protected] (Dmitry Stogov) Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:57:33 +0400
| Newsgroups | php.apc.dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/28/2011 11:49 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On 07/28/2011 12:42 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> On 07/28/2011 11:23 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: >>> On 07/28/2011 12:20 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >>>> Hi Rasmus, >>>> >>>> Wrong decision. >>>> You make PHP slower just because can't solve an APC issue. :( >>>> I believe the problem may be solved in APC itself. >>>> Please, revert the patch. >>> >>> PHP is even slower if APC doesn't work with it. I don't see how this can >>> be solved entirely on the APC side. I'm open to suggestions. >> >> APC is not a single opcode cache, so you are slowing down the others. >> I probably can find a solution to fix APC, if I get permission to do it. >> >> But, anyway, please revert the patch. I spent weeks developing the >> interned strings solution and now you are slowing it down before >> listening to my opinion. > > You don't need permission to contribute to APC. Go ahead. We've spent a > long time on APC as well, and the interned strings broke it. Right now > we have a stable state where both PHP and APC work. The patch didn't > break other opcode caches it only slowed them down a little bit. Great unfair decision, especially because other (at least O+) worked fine. > There > are a large number of sites out there that rely extensively on APC and > they haven't been able to test 5.4 in their environments because of this > problem. > > We can revert for now, but we have another alpha release scheduled for > next week and I want all the folks who have been blocked by APC being > broken to be able to participate in this release so we need a solution > we can all live with by then. Yeah, revert please. I'll take a look into APC after that. Thanks. Dmitry. > -Rasmus