Re: [APC-DEV] Recursive zval patch for review/comments

Gopal V wrote:
> Just because zval->refcount == 0 doesn't mean apc_destroy_zval()
> can automatically apc_sma_free() it. This literally corrupts
> prv->next with junk from the previous zend_op and crashes happen
> relatively randomly.
> 
> The real problem is that sma_deallocate() acts rather dumb about
> whether it got a valid offset to free or not.

Good find Gopal.  Can we try to aim for a public release in the next
couple of weeks?  We (and by we I mean Brian and Gopal) have added a
bunch of stuff in the past couple of months with bits and pieces in use
both at Yahoo and Facebook, but the public release is a bit stale.


-Rasmus