Re: [PHP-DOC] RE: [DOC-HU] PHP DOC BUILDS -- PLEASE READ

[email protected] (Gabor Hojtsy) Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:20:54 +0200
Newsgroups php.doc,php.doc.ar,php.doc.de,php.doc.es,php.doc.fi,php.doc.fr,php.doc.he,php.doc.hk,php.doc.hu,php.doc.it,php.doc.ja,php.doc.kr,php.doc.nl,php.doc.pl,php.doc.pt-br,php.doc.ro,php.doc.ru,php.doc.sk,php.doc.sl,php.doc.sv,php.doc.tr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > It seems that only 'ar' had been tried to be built. I have fixed the
> > error. BTW 'ar' does not need to be built anyway, it has only 11kb
> > translated content. Compared to the total 10-11MB in the English tree,
> > this is quite nothing. It was last modified more then a year ago. Or I
> > got some old files from CVS...
>
> Yes. Right now we're on 'es'

Well, as I checked there were no substantial problems in building any 
languages till 'es'. One noticable thing though is that iSilo386 is not set 
up on rsync.php.net, so that format cannnot be generated. The last isilo file 
generated is from November. The question is do we really need that format or 
not? We used to have two different palm formats, implemented in the build 
system by Jesus, but now we only have one in the mirror files build list. Do 
we need any? The php documentation may not be ideal to read on a palm, but I 
don't know who uses it, I don't have a palm...

Goba