Re: [SVN-MIGRATION] Reorganization and splitting

[email protected] ("Hannes Magnusson")
Newsgroups php.doc.web,php.pear.webmaster,php.pecl.dev,php.webmaster,svn.migration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:48, Gwynne Raskind
<[email protected]> wrote:
> In order to progress further on the SVN conversion, I need to know how many
> projects need separate repositories from php-src, and the purpose and active
> status of *all* the current CVS modules. The complete list of current CVS
> modules is appended to the end of this e-mail. Anyone with status
> information on them, please step forward and let me know. And anyone who
> knows which projects need to be their own SVN repository, instead of merged
> with that of php-src, also please let me know.

[svn-migration@: this is the last you'll hear from me tonight, sorry all!!!]

[CCing all relevant mailinglists]

I would like _all_ *.php.net websites to be under the repository.

NOTE: This does _NOT_ include gd or other "PHP umbrella projects",
*only* *.php.net!

GD (and potentially) other "PHP umbrella" projects will have to make
their own decisions as I have no "authority" (aka: ego) there.

qa.php.net, php.net, pear.php.net, pecl, snaps, pecl4win, docweb,
windows, wiki [and probably more I forgot about].

I talked this over with Helgi (pear-webmaster@) and he totally agrees.
(the rest of the sites I have no clue about, they either don't have a
"dedicated webteam" and/or I don't even have karma for them].


-Hannes

(p.s. this is private joke between me and Pierre (which he will
totally hate me for, but its worth it!)): php-windows-web!!!!!!!!
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.