Re: Please stop anonymous login to edit.php.net

[email protected] ("Christoph M. Becker")
Newsgroups php.doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 26.04.2021 at 19:19, André L F S Bacci wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 2:26 PM Christoph M. Becker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 26.04.2021 at 15:06, Sergey Panteleev wrote:
>>
>>> I can't say about other languages,
>>> but I currently use the editor only to track changes.
>>>
>>> George started to change the revcheck section [1],
>>> but it seems now the script is still taking data from git.php.net, not
>> GitHub.
>>>
>>> If we can track the changes on that site, then there is no point in the
>> editor (although I really like it).
>>>
>>> Also, if you look at the authorization history at edit.php.net, not
>> many people go there.
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to restore the editor to work for everyone,
>>> or is it better to direct efforts to finish and deploy the new revcheck?
>>>
>>> [1] http://doc.php.gpb.moe/tools/revcheck/
>>
>> Well, it seems the refcheck has been updated to also allow to check
>> Github[1], although I'm not sure whether that update will be used on the
>> server automatically.
>
> doc-base/scripts/revcheck.php and web-doc/www/revcheck.php are two separate
> entities. The first is a text only, local only script and the other is db
> based (as I remember) web script.

Ah, thanks!  I wasn't really aware that these are different scripts.

> So... no. It's possible to use the new algos from doc-base version to
> recreate a fast web-doc script, but it will need a local git checkout of
> GitHub repositories.
>
> Anyhow, I think we should work on revcheck (if there's the need for more
>> work), and decide afterwards what to do with edit.php.net. :)
>
> It's necessary to qualify what one you are asking... the doc-base one or
> the web-doc one.

In this case it is about the web-doc script, since this is likely the
one users otherwise using edit.php.net would use.

> The doc-base only has been receiving updates, slowly making him back to his
> former glory, as it is heavily used by translators who prefer command line.
> The web-doc one, focused on translators on the web, will suffer more from
> the lack of capacity to generate individual file diffs in a consistent
> manner.

--
Christoph M. Becker
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.