Re: Experimental opening of php/doc-en issues

[email protected] (Nikita Popov)
Newsgroups php.doc
Message-ID <CAF+90c_Sq83eFCWSfpFo0jB+cPWXH=DO1yZS_Sf72-Ju0GEd+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:42 AM Peter Cowburn <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 16:02, Christoph M. Becker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 21.10.2021 at 16:33, Nikita Popov wrote:
>> >
>> > To follow up on this, I'd like to disable the option to submit a
>> > "Documentation Problem" on bugs.php.net with
>> > https://github.com/php/web-bugs/pull/107. Instead, submitters are
>> directed
>> > to issues on php/doc-en. This avoids having two places where new
>> > documentation bugs may be submitted. Are there any objections to doing
>> > this? (It's still possible to reclassify submitted bugs as doc problems
>> > after the fact.)
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> In principle, I'm +1.
>
> Is there any project/team that would be blocked by this? I'm thinking
> along the lines of maaaaybe a PECL package that doesn't have their docs in
> php/doc-* but does use the bug tracker.
>

Here's the intersection of "Documentation Problem" and "PECL":
https://bugs.php.net/search.php?limit=40&order_by=id&direction=DESC&cmd=display&status=Open&bug_type=Documentation+Problem&project=PECL
From a cursory look I can only spot the "uuid" extension missing from
php.net -- and the bug report is complaining about precisely that fact :)
So it doesn't seem like PECL exts are using bugs.php.net to track their
custom documentation.


> I'm going to assume this also affects the "Documentation Problem" package
> as well as the ticket type, right?
>

I haven't disabled that one yet, but I agree we should. Actually, this
should have happened ages ago, ever since "Documentation Problem" became a
separate bug type rather than a package.


> If directing submitters to one other place to create their issue, it
> should be an appropriate place for all documentation issues.
> github.com/php/doc-en is not that place.
>

To clarify, are you talking about translations here? We could adjust the
issue creation process on doc-en to link to other repos for translation
issues, though I think it's also fine to let people report translation
issues on doc-en, which we then transfer to a more appropriate repo.
Depends on how common they are. In either case doc-en would be the entry
point though, just a question of adjusting issue templates.

Regards,
Nikita
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.