Ability to flag docs comments as outdated or off-topic
[email protected] (Jamison Bryant) Fri, 29 May 2026 10:06:31 -0400
| Newsgroups | php.doc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP4fLeNqrcGDKpcd9ABjbDDsvY1ghvW8_2AbBqiG17-3BWRkQA@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000bc2e6a0652f55a74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I had an idea to improve the docs that I was discussing with Larry Garfield and he suggested I bring it to this list. Something I think could benefit the PHP docs is *the ability for users to mark comments as out-of-date or off-topic*, when they have clearly gone stale or contain erroneous info. Here is a concrete example, see the top comment on this page: https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.curl-multi-init.php The most-upvoted comment contains this link: http://arguments.callee.info/2010/02/21/multiple-curl-requests-with-php/ which is a DEAD link. Also, all of the comments on that page are nearly a decade old, with the youngest being posted 8 years ago. The upvote system alone doesn't fully solve this kind of issue. With so few comments on the page, even if the broken-link comment were voted to the bottom, it would still be visible and still mislead readers. A "flag as outdated" or "flag as off-topic" mechanism would give the community a lightweight way to surface stale comments for maintainer review. Warm regards, Jamison --000000000000bc2e6a0652f55a74 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:-apple-system,sans-serif">Hell= o,</span><br></div><div><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><d= iv><div class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature"><div d= ir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">I had an idea to improve the docs tha= t I was discussing with Larry Garfield and he suggested=C2=A0I bring it=C2= =A0to this list.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Som= ething I think could benefit the PHP docs is <b>the ability for users to ma= rk comments as out-of-date or off-topic</b>, when they have clearly gone st= ale or contain erroneous info.=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div d= ir=3D"ltr">Here is a concrete example, see=C2=A0the top comment on this pag= e:</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><a href=3D"https://www.= php.net/manual/en/function.curl-multi-init.php" target=3D"_blank">https://w= ww.php.net/manual/en/function.curl-multi-init.php</a>=C2=A0<br></div><div d= ir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">The most-upvoted comment contains thi= s link: <a href=3D"http://arguments.callee.info/2010/02/21/multiple-curl-re= quests-with-php/" target=3D"_blank">http://arguments.callee.info/2010/02/21= /multiple-curl-requests-with-php/</a>=C2=A0which is a DEAD link. Also, all = of the comments on that page are nearly a decade old, with the youngest bei= ng posted 8 years ago.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">The= upvote system alone doesn't fully solve this kind of issue. With so fe= w comments on the page, even if the broken-link comment were voted to the b= ottom, it would still be visible and still mislead readers.=C2=A0A "fl= ag as outdated" or "flag as off-topic" mechanism would give = the community a lightweight way to surface stale comments for maintainer re= view.</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr"><span style=3D"font-= family:-apple-system,sans-serif">Warm regards,</span><br></div><div dir=3D"= ltr"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr">Jamison</div><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div></d= iv></div> </div></div> --000000000000bc2e6a0652f55a74--