Re: [PHP-EVANGELISM] PEAR Documentation

[email protected] (Dave Mertens)
Newsgroups php.evangelism
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:27:30AM -0400, Sean Coates wrote:
> Regarding PHP Evangelism, I think there's a LOT of work to be done with 
> PEAR, especially concerning documentation. (yes, I know there are PEAR 
> lists, but this directly relates to evangelism).
> 
> and coding standards. (link: 
> http://www.sitepointforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=50331). Here's an 
> excerpt that really got my attention:
Ok, to be honest, the PHP.net site is more referential than useful.
I think we should write some documentation (white papers, tutorials, etc)
about how thing can be done in PHP or with PEAR classes/packages.

I'm thinking about how to program a webservive in PHP, using SOAP and XML.
Using PEAR DB, caching, logging, etc.

 
> --
> (1 -Skunk)
> PEAR is developing into a superb resource and it's a great shame more PHP 
> coders aren't aware of it - this is mainly thanks to the PEAR site being 
> pretty rubbish (there's lots of information on PEAR but very little of it 
> is available to the public via pear.php.net)
> (2 -Skunk (again))
Martin, stig and James are already convincing pear developers to write at
least docbook/phpdoc referential documentation. 

But developers can't write user manuals. That's a fact, just like a
programmer can't test his own code..


> PEAR's greatest weakness in my opinion is pear.php.net - the documentation 
> there is fine but it is very limited and gives a bad representation of what 
> PEAR is. The fact that Renegade is hung up on the coding standard is a 
> direct result of the PEAR website not being clear enough - instead of the 
> coding standard being hidden away in an apendix somewhere where only PEAR 
> developers will read it it is sat on the main website giving off the 
> impression that it is the most important thing about PEAR.
I believe the pear website is currently maintained by 4 developers, who do
web developent as documentation.

I agree with the fact PHP needs more 'user' documentation. But who is
willing to write it?

The mailing lists are mainly used by active pear and php (the c-code)
programmers. PHP web developers aren't really using the mailinglists or
maybe some the php-general list.

-- 
With best regards,

Dave Mertens, Development Manager
[email protected]

Innovative Solutions in Media BV
Schiekade 101
3033 BG  Rotterdam, Netherlands
Tel. +31-10-2436060
Fax. +31-10-2436066
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.