Re: [PHP] Re: php framework vs just php?
[email protected] (Shawn McKenzie)
| Newsgroups | php.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Cummings wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 16:50 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > >> Robert Cummings wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:05 -0500, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >>> >>>> Tony Marston wrote: >>>> >>>>> ""Jay Blanchard"" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>> news:[email protected]... >>>>> [snip] >>>>> >>>>>>> You haven't answered the question. Where can this piece of wizardry be >>>>>>> downloaded so that it can be reviewed by your peers? >>>>>>> >>>>> [/snip] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> It is not available for download >>>>>> >>>>> So your claims cannot be substantiated by anyone in this group. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> but it has been reviewed by peers on >>>>>> several project teams who have used it. It was developed specifically >>>>>> for a company who owns the work product. I have not re-created for >>>>>> general use by mere mortals but I will soon. >>>>>> >>>>> Let me know when as I could do with a good laugh. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Well, if you would take the time to individually download > 1,000 >>>> classes and piece them together you may find a very feature rich >>>> framework: http://www.phpclasses.org. Or maybe meta storage >>>> http://www.meta-language.net/metastorage.html. >>>> >>> Or you may find you've got >999 classes of code you'll never use :) That >>> would be one hell of an undertaking to piece them together. I'm going to >>> guess you'll need namespaces too since I bet some of them step on each >>> other's toes. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Rob. >>> >> Obviously not a very good one, but that was in the spirit of a joke. ;-) >> > > I took it that way :) > > Cheers, > Rob. > Then say haha, not a long dissection of how sorry and shitty my post was :-) -Shawn