Re: [PHP] Re: sloppiness & stupidity

[email protected] (LinuxManMikeC)
Newsgroups php.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I don't know what validator you're using, but according to
http://validator.w3.org/ (as official as it gets) the following
fragment is correct in HTML 4.01, HTML 5, XHTML 1.0 Strict, and XHTML
1.1:

<select>
  <option selected="selected">test</option>
</select>

Thus sayeth the W3C, so let it be written, so let it be done.  Go read
a tutorial on the transition to XHTML as well as XML.

2009/6/17 PJ <[email protected]>:
> Nisse Engström wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, "Ford, Mike" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
>>> value, so an XHTML conformant page will use <select multiple="multiple"
>>> name="selector"> (or something similar such as <select multiple="yes"
>>> name="selector">). The only inconsistency here is that different people
>>> have chosen to validate against different standards.
>>>
>>
>> The multiple attribute only has one value: "multiple", so
>> it has to be <select multiple="multiple">. I don't think
>> "yes" cuts the mustard. In HTML, you can shorten it to
>> <select multiple>.
>>
> From my limited experience, and vast reading of those glorious 20,000
> entries on the Internet, multiple does not take a parameter. I had my
> fingers slapped once when I validated or something - multiple is just
> plain multiple ! :-P ;-) :-)
>
> --
> Hervé Kempf: "Pour sauver la planète, sortez du capitalisme."
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Phil Jourdan --- [email protected]
>   http://www.ptahhotep.com
>   http://www.chiccantine.com/andypantry.php
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.