Re: [PHP] Re: PHP in HTML code

[email protected] (Adam Richardson)
Newsgroups php.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Ashley Sheridan
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:37 +0100, Jan G.B. wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2010/3/18 Ashley Sheridan <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >         On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 18:09 +0100, Jan G.B. wrote:
> >
> >         > 2010/3/18 Ashley Sheridan <[email protected]>
> >         >
> >         > >  I'd rather have short tags turned off than remember each
> time that I have
> >         > > to keep breaking up the < and ?php before I output it in-case
> the parser
> >         > > gets confused.
> >         > >
> >         >
> >         > You don't need to break anything up. It's perfectly valid and
> without
> >         > problems:
> >         >
> >         > <?php echo '<?xml version.... ?>'; ?>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         What about this:
> >
> >         <?xml version="1.0">
> >         <?php
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It's confusing! =)
> >
> >
> >         That would break with short tags turned on. I often use this
> >         sort of code in my Ajax server stuff. I don't want to have to
> >         use PHP to echo out what would work on a normal setup.
> >
> >
> > I can understand it. But I think it's nonsense to output one line of
> > "text" (prolog) and then start with <?php - while arguing that the
> > first line of PHP should not be an echo. Where's the point?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >         Ash
> >         http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> That was just a really small example. Imagine the <?xml line followed by
> other lines of actual XML content that might remain static:
>
> <?xml version="1.0">
> <content>
>    <other_stuff/>
>    <even_more_stuff/>
>    <?php
>    // code that changes here
>    ?>
> </content>
>
> I could use heredoc or nowdoc, but why that's just ugly, and the
> resulting XML inside the heredoc/nowdoc isn't recognised as XML by any
> editor I know of. All of that to avoid writing a few extra characters to
> "save myself some work"...
>
> Thanks,
> Ash
> http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
>
>
>

   - 310 characters.
   - Differentiation between code that's merely echoed and code that
   performs some operation.
   - XML is recognized by editors.
   - Easier for me to visually scan.

<?=  '<?xml version="1.0">' ?>
<content>
   <?php foreach ($rows as $row)  { ?>
   <row>
      <title><?= $row['title'] ?></title>
      <type><?= $row['type'] ?></type>
      <desc><?= $row['desc'] ?></desc>
      <date><?= $row['date'] ?></date>
      <other><?= $row['other'] ?></other>
   </row>
   <? } ?>
</content>




   - 340 characters.
   - All code blocks consistent.
   - XML recognized by editors.


<?xml version="1.0">
<content>
   <?php foreach ($rows as $row)  { ?>
   <row>
      <title><?php echo $row['title']; ?></title>
      <type><?php echo $row['type']; ?></type>
      <desc><?php echo $row['desc']; ?></desc>
      <date><?php echo $row['date']; ?></date>
      <other><?php echo $row['other']; ?></other>
   </row>
   <? } ?>
</content>

Given the choice, I'd rather work with the first option, but I have no
problem with those who prefer the second option.

Adam

-- 
Nephtali:  PHP web framework that functions beautifully
http://nephtaliproject.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.