Re: [PHP] Storing Social Security Number WAS: Encryption/Decryption Question

[email protected] (tedd)
Newsgroups php.general
Message-ID <p06240803c889b2b33f84@[192.168.1.104]>
At 2:59 PM +0100 8/12/10, Richard Quadling wrote:
>On 12 August 2010 14:45, tedd <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  At 5:30 PM -0700 8/11/10, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>>>
>>>   > -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>>   2. Were told it was a social security number
>>>>     (i.e., in the form of 123-45-6789).
>>>
>>>  Stop.
>>>
>>>  Why are you even contemplating storing SS# ??
>
>Why hold the SSN (encrypted or otherwise). If you hold it encrypted,
>then the keys have to exist somewhere and that will cost you
>something.
>
>Why not hold a non reversible hash? That way you can't determine the
>SSN, but someone posing as the SSN holder presents their SSN, you run
>it through the same hash routine and compare the hashes. If they
>match, then the SSN is valid. If not, then not.
>
>Don't store the SSN would be my way.
>
>The same way you don't store passwords using a reversible technology.
>
>Richard Quadling.

Richard:

That would work (and does work) for storing things like passwords. I 
have routines where users logon and enters their password where I 
md5() it and store the hash in a database. The next time the user 
logs on, the script again runs the password through the md5() and 
compares results with the database. If there is a match, then access 
is provided. If not, then it fails. All of this without me (the 
database) knowing what the password actually was.

However in this case, the authorized users of database must be able 
to see the actual SS# for their processing. Seeing a md(), or any 
other hash, would not serve the purpose of having the numbers in the 
database.

Cheers,

tedd


-- 
-------
http://sperling.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.