transferring iis7, php5, mysql project to another server

[email protected] ("Harrison, Roberto")
Newsgroups php.general
Message-ID <CE54848D.174D8%[email protected]>
I have a working project using the above resources, though these are on a
Windows Server 2008 trial installation on a virtual machine in VMWare.

Is there an easy way to transfer the whole project to a legit Windows
Server 2008? So far I have the following backed up:

administration.config
applicationHost.config
redirection.config
Arachnophilia folder
MySQL folder
php folder
phpdebug folder
wwwroot folder

Thanks in advance.


Roberto Harrison, MLIS
Technology Support Librarian
Medical College of Wisconsin Libraries
Link.Learn.Lead


.




On 9/3/13 8:31 AM, "Stuart Dallas" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 3 Sep 2013, at 02:30, Daevid Vincent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused on how a reference works I think.
>> 
>> I have a DB result set in an array I'm looping over. All I simply want
>>to do
>> is make the array key the "id" of the result set row.
>> 
>> This is the basic gist of it:
>> 
>>       private function _normalize_result_set()
>>       {
>>              foreach($this->tmp_results as $k => $v)
>>              {
>>                     $id = $v['id'];
>>                     $new_tmp_results[$id] =& $v; //2013-08-29 [dv]
>>using a
>> reference here cuts the memory usage in half!
>
>You are assigning a reference to $v. In the next iteration of the loop,
>$v will be pointing at the next item in the array, as will the reference
>you're storing here. With this code I'd expect $new_tmp_results to be an
>array where the keys (i.e. the IDs) are correct, but the data in each
>item matches the data in the last item from the original array, which
>appears to be what you describe.
>
>>                     unset($this->tmp_results[$k]);
>
>Doing this for every loop is likely very inefficient. I don't know how
>the inner workings of PHP process something like this, but I wouldn't be
>surprised if it's allocating a new chunk of memory for a version of the
>array without this element. You may find it better to not unset anything
>until the loop has finished, at which point you can just
>unset($this->tmp_results).
>
>> 
>>                     /*
>>                     if ($i++ % 1000 == 0)
>>                     {
>>                           gc_enable(); // Enable Garbage Collector
>>                           var_dump(gc_enabled()); // true
>>                           var_dump(gc_collect_cycles()); // # of
>>elements
>> cleaned up
>>                           gc_disable(); // Disable Garbage Collector
>>                     }
>>                     */
>>              }
>>              $this->tmp_results = $new_tmp_results;
>>              //var_dump($this->tmp_results); exit;
>>              unset($new_tmp_results);
>>       }
>
>
>Try this:
>
>private function _normalize_result_set()
>{
>  // Initialise the temporary variable.
>  $new_tmp_results = array();
>
>  // Loop around just the keys in the array.
>  foreach (array_keys($this->tmp_results) as $k)
>  {
>    // Store the item in the temporary array with the ID as the key.
>    // Note no pointless variable for the ID, and no use of &!
>    $new_tmp_results[$this->tmp_results[$k]['id']] =
>$this->tmp_results[$k];
>  }
>
>  // Assign the temporary variable to the original variable.
>  $this->tmp_results = $new_tmp_results;
>}
>
>I'd appreciate it if you could plug this in and see what your memory
>usage reports say. In most cases, trying to control the garbage
>collection through the use of references is the worst way to go about
>optimising your code. In my code above I'm relying on PHPs copy-on-write
>feature where data is only duplicated when assigned if it changes. No
>unsets, just using scope to mark a variable as able to be cleaned up.
>
>Where is this result set coming from? You'd save yourself a lot of
>memory/time by putting the data in to this format when you read it from
>the source. For example, if reading it from MySQL,
>$this->tmp_results[$row['id']] = $row when looping around the result set.
>
>Also, is there any reason why you need to process this full set of data
>in one go? Can you not break it up in to smaller pieces that won't put as
>much strain on resources?
>
>-Stuart
>
>-- 
>Stuart Dallas
>3ft9 Ltd
>http://3ft9.com/
>
>-- 
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.