Re: [PHP-GTK] Status of PHP-GTK
[email protected] (Bob Majdak Jr) Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:07:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | php.gtk.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Even if PHP.NET would allow any of these options, who is going to implement it? And then who is going to populate it? It might get done at first, but I would be willing to wager it gets done once and just like the current docs once it is out of date everyone disappears. (Actually, I wager it gets half done). I have no idea what the current system is like, I just know somewhere someone is making the executive decision to stay with what is there. - bob On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Keith Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Benjamin Smith wrote: > >> To: [email protected] >> From: Benjamin Smith <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK] Status of PHP-GTK >> >> I offer some counter points, here... >> >> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 06:53:48 Bob Majdak Jr wrote: >>> >>> Coding is really limping along just fine. Tonnes of people hate the >>> docs, less than tonnes offer to help, none of them actually do. >> >> Sometime ago, I was offered the opportunity to update the docs, and was >> picturing that it would be something like a fancy wiki or somesuch. >> Instead, I >> was introduced to text files with a very complicated tagging system and a >> steep >> learning curve. I don't remember what it was, it's been a few years, and >> I'm >> sure there are good reasons for choosing it. >> >> After struggling for some hours over a few days on it (and even starting a >> docs editor in PHP-GTK to manage some of the complexity) I threw in the >> towel >> and resigned myself to leaving (hopefully helpful) comments. >> >> Can this be made simpler? Do you know of some kind of doc-editor manager >> doohickey to take track all the tagging? > > Maybe something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LyX > > would suffice, if only PDF documentation was needed? > > Kind Regards, > > Keith Roberts > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Websites: > http://www.php-debuggers.net > http://www.karsites.net > http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk > > All email addresses are challenge-response protected with > TMDA [http://tmda.net] > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > >> >>> Granted >>> extra coders would help but patch writers are easier to come across than >>> people actually willing to do the docs. And the coders can usually >>> figure out what to do by knowing GTK in C or by looking at the C GTK >>> manual. >> >> Get_class_methods() and get_object_vars(), and Google are my substitutes. >> I >> make it a point to leave notes when I can. >> >>> The PHP doc system i am sure is not going anywhere, and personally I >>> like comments off, it is a manual not a wbe forum. That is one of the >>> things I hate the most about the actual PHP docs, especally when a new >>> guy posts a code sample that is horrid and the next 20 posts are people >>> saying "oh hay i made this better". I am not being bitter. Honest. >> >> It's common for me to be baffled by minimalist docs, only to find a >> comment that >> makes it all clear... I'm perfectly willing to ignore the crappy, >> 3-page-long >> code samples in order to have the nuggets that make my day! And sometimes, >> even the 3-page-long crappy code gives enough detail about how to use XYX >> function that it's useful. >> >> ...perhaps a moderation system for comments? >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> >> -- >> PHP-GTK General Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > > -- > PHP-GTK General Mailing List (http://gtk.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >