RE: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c /intl/tests grapheme.phpt

[email protected] ("Andi Gutmans") Thu, 1 May 2008 15:15:27 -0700
Newsgroups php.i18n,php.pecl.cvs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The mailing list to the best of my knowledge can be subscribed to also
by the general public but I do think it makes more sense to have these
discussions on [email protected] based on
http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php.
Please everyone only use that mailing list from now on.

Andi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: Ed Batutis; Andi Gutmans
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PECL-CVS] cvs: pecl /intl php_intl.c /intl/doc
> grapheme_api.php /intl/grapheme grapheme.h grapheme_string.c
> /intl/tests grapheme.phpt
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Ed Batutis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >  > I use "you" for all intl developers :) We sent many many mails
> (this
> >  > list and internals) about the poor naming of these new functions
> and
> >  > got zero reply so far.
> >
> >  Personally I think the naming is OK - maybe not perfect, but what
is
> >  perfect? Anyway, there was a long discussion about this on the php-
> icu list.
> >  I think that's where you might want to post your thoughts.
> 
> How ironic, this list is still private despite our discussions. I
> think that that helps me to finally (re)consider intl.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org