Re: [PHP-I18N] Code updates?

"Andrei Zmievski" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Okay. I do want to mention that your code seems to be very object oriented 
> and has a complete separate class hierarchy (starting with I18NBase?). I 
> am not sure that we can use it as is in PHP. I think we discussed making 
> most of the ICU API procedural, with some OO parts. At the very least we 
> need a thorough review before we decide on anything.

Not a problem. When i started, my goal was to adhere to the ICU C++ API, 
mainly for documentation and Java compatibility reasons (there's lots of 
code out there that would be easily adaptable).

I personally prefer the OOP approach, but i'll work on whatever is decided.

BTW - the I18NBase thing was simply a way of dealing with some nested object 
lifetime management issues, which i've found a easier way to resolve.

Clayton


> -Andrei
>
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:08 PM, l0t3k wrote:
>
>> Andrei,
>>   keep in mind that this is still very alpha level. Its a reconstruction 
>> of
>> the most recent backup i could find after my machine crashed last year.
>>
>> Clayton
>>