Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] Debugging doze configuration

> My answer was polite and clear

No, your answer was defensive/abusive, as always. I knew better than to 
expect 'Thanks for debugging that Steph!' but I didn't actually expect you 
to try and blame me for your workaround. I should've thought twice.

> and I don't see (neither want to know)
> how I could have answered to make you happy, we can fix that after
> alpha2 (which happens to be today, surprise).

Interesting. The RMs told us the 2nd. Either way, I'm not sure what my 
happiness has to do with it. Or why you're arguing a point we already agreed 
on, come to that.

>> because I couldn't MFB immediately in the week you decided it was 
>> important is, frankly, just another exhibition of your mud-slinging 
>> skillz.
>
> Releases and working builds are what matter to us, like it or not.

Pierre: PHP 6 was not a working build at that point, and God only knows it's 
a million light years from any form of release. The test suite wasn't 
usable; come to that, it still wasn't usable last time I checked. Very few 
people had been merging to HEAD, much less from HEAD to 5_3, and this had 
been the case for years not weeks. Your request at that time was not only 
made in an aggressive way, it was also unreasonable. Your responses to 
anything I post are *always* unreasonable. Even 'happy birthday', for pity's 
sake.

>> I gave you a fix. You can even take the credit for it. Now give it a 
>> rest.
>
> I don't care about credits or whatever else

The nature of your communications and pattern of behaviour over the last 
near-decade strongly suggests otherwise. Most OSS developers would work with 
those already working on a given area of code and see them as useful people, 
not try to disenfranchise them.

- Steph