Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] RE: [PHP-DEV] Differences in VC6 and VC9 Windows builds and MSSQL Driver.

hi,

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think we should do some announcement to the SAPI maintainers to ask them
> to check their modules with their servers (if the SAPI is available for
> Windows).

We did, you were the last one :) And you know it now (as we discussed
that already before about the nsapi support in 5.3 and now here :)

The other sapi are either dead (p3web) or not compatible (thttpd,
etc.). Apache will be apache2 only (apache1 on windows never worked
well and is now unmaintained).

ISAPI should be kept, however we may disable it before 5.3.0-final but
leave the sources in place for 3rd parties (there is a discussion on
this list about that). FastCGI is the supported SAPI for IIS these
days (by php or MSFT), as it works way better than ISAPI.

> For NSAPI, I will do this some time in future (low priority),
> because it is some work to install a windows server and add SJSWS 7.0 to it
> and possibly debug it (if it does not work). SJSWS is not able to run on my
> local Win XP Prof (I am not sure about this, maybe it works, I will give it
> a try).

I'm not sure testing the NSAPI on XP makes any sense. You may test it
on 2k3 or 2k8 instead :)

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org