Re: [INTERNALS-WIN] [PATCH] Static dependency errors

[email protected] ("Steph Fox")
Newsgroups php.internals.win
Message-ID <004e01c8e9e4$0b5dc890$a7bd614d@foxbox>
Hi,

>> ps (off-list) Did you actually try it?
>
> Please post all replies to the list.

Just trying to avoid embarrassing you. So that'll be a 'no' then.

> I read it and it does partially why I'm working on. The only reason
> why I did not commit is the recent decisions and updates. We have soon
> a deadlines and many dependencies and builds have to be tested and
> validated before.

Surely that's a good reason to commit now, so everyone can test?

> It will be committed early next week (certainly Monday evening or
> Tuesday evening).  You can then play with it. However the idea is to
> have a clear list of everything relevant happening during a configure
> call:
>
> - Error(s), fatal or warnings like dep or header not found for which ext
> - Requested feature can't be enabled
> - List of enabled features (ext, sapi, etc.), partially done already and 
> in cvs
> - QA validation check for release process

You're talking entirely about the summary here I take it? In this case yes, 
I definitely do need to wait for your commit before submitting a patch for 
this.

>>> goodness, you can now build php without having any library available
>>> but resolv.lib (and this one will be dropped soon as well).
>>
>> You can do that with my patch, too.
>
> You can do that right now already.

Yes but the whole point is to kill complexity further down the line. Yours 
works, but it works in a way that means others (e.g. across PECL) have to 
rewrite their own. Mine works in a way that negates the need for that.

> They are logic, it has been discussed (by you) since my very commit
> about such change. Can we move on please?

There are actually good reasons for my objection, Pierre. I'm not saying it 
just to upset you.

>> Could you point me to some discussion of this upcoming error level and
>> logging option?
>
> See the list archives (it is not that big) and the IRC logs if there
> is any (no idea here).

What was all that about not discussing things off-list again? ;)

- Steph
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.