Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 8.6
[email protected] ("Gina P. Banyard") Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:40:54 +0000
| Newsgroups | php.internals |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pxi9VGEmKDCkFOVixQD5upMlBfoblg2sFnYEgUbJYuJsq7ADFBPm5EEtfxb-Tzf_SU1GlwnYs0h1veQ0vx_uXBFE1QGLU094VSLjUydJtoc=@gpb.moe> |
On Monday, 13 July 2026 at 17:04, Gina P. Banyard <[email protected]> wrote= : >=20 > On Tuesday, 7 July 2026 at 12:54, Gina P. Banyard <[email protected]> wro= te: >=20 > > On Monday, 22 June 2026 at 14:13, Gina P. Banyard <[email protected]> w= rote: > > > > > Hello internals, > > > > > > It is this time of year again where we proposed a list of deprecation= s to add in PHP 8.6: > > > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_6 > > > > > > As a reminder, this list has been compiled over the course of the pas= t year by different people. > > > > > > And as usual, each deprecation will be voted in isolation. > > > > > > We still have a bit of time anyone else to propose additional depreca= tions, and if you have write access feel free to add them directly to the R= FC. > > > Please note that with the new RFC policy rules the RFC must be finali= zed and in a "frozen" state by the 13th of July at the latest. > > > > > > Some deprecations should be non-controversial, others a bit more. > > > If a deprecation is really controversial, it might warrant its own de= dicated RFC or be dropped altogether. > > > > Reminder that there is less than a single week for adding deprecations = before the RFC needs to be in a frozen state. > > A few people have added new ones and some were sent directly to me whic= h I just added. > > I also reordered some of the deprecations to group them together in som= ewhat more logical places. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_8_6 > > > > If anyone has any issues or additional proposals they can still be adde= d or amended. > > If none are added or amended, I will initiate a call to vote next week. >=20 > The RFC is now *frozen* no new proposals will be accepted. > As some were added during the past week minimum of 2 weeks discussion is = necessary. > Amendments to existing proposals can be made ONLY IF they are minor chang= es according to the policy. > I will initiate a call to vote next week on Monday (the 20th) for the fol= lowing Monday (the 27th) so that the vote is done by the 10th of August. > This should hopefully mean that most accepted proposals can land with 8.6= .0beta1. As said last week, I intend to open the vote next Monday (the 27th of July)= for 2 weeks so that the vote is finished on time for 8.6. Best regards, Gina P. Banyard