Re: [PHP-DEV] SNMP RFC amendments and clarification
[email protected] (Steven Wilton)
| Newsgroups | php.internals |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/09/2026 6:52 pm, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Hi > > On 2026-08-21 14:23, Gina P. Banyard wrote: >> The following RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/snmp_improvements_2026 >> stipulated that the proposed PHP versions for this RFC are: "Next >> stable release for all currently supported PHP versions." >> >> This goes against our policy regarding versioning >> (https://github.com/php/policies/blob/main/release-process.rst#patch-version-number). >> >> As such these changes will *only* land in PHP 8.6. >> >> Moreover, I suggested replacing the new integer constants for the >> "Implement more MIB parsing and value output controls" part of the >> RFC by PHP enums to improve type safety from the userland perspective. >> I think this is an improvement on multiple levels as it also >> effectively "translates" the C enums defined by SNMP to PHP enums >> exposed to userland. >> >> The plan is to have this merged in time for PHP 8.6.0beta2 so people >> can test this. > > Thank you. Both amendments make sense do me. > > Can you (or Steven) shortly mention the changes in an Errata section > in the RFC so that it's clear to everyone reading the RFC that the > final version differs from what was being voted on? See > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application_v2#errata or > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/redact_parameters_in_back_traces#errata as an > example. > > The “Status: Accepted” at the top RFC could be updated to > “Implemented” at the same time. > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus Hi, I've updated the wiki with both the new status and the errata section. regards Steve