Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC
[email protected] (Andrea Faulds)
| Newsgroups | php.internals |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23 Aug 2014, at 10:43, Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's ok to keep zend_off_t and zend_size_t as is. Could someone enlighten me as to why we need zend_size_t? Isn’t that just a typedef for size_t? It’s not like it’ll vary on different platforms, doing so would defeat the purpose of using size_t in the first place. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/