Fwd: date extension broken tests

[email protected] (Dmitry Stogov)
Newsgroups php.internals
Message-ID <CA+9eiLtE4m1C=8mmz3GxvFvT528YcZY+GXsrSX=FnKw4WZ90Zg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Derick,

Could you please take a look into these tests failures.
I actually, think that the new behavior is right.
Calls to parent::__constructor() shouldn't change value of already
constructed $this.

The expectation of ext/data/tests/bug67118_2.phpt looks completely wrong.

The actual output of ext/data/tests/bug67118.phpt seems right.

I'm going to change expectation of these tests in master if you don't
object.

Thanks. Dmitry.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: date extension broken tests
To: Lior Kaplan <[email protected]>
Cc: Anatol Belski <[email protected]>


Hi Lior,

This is known phpng related problem described here
https://wiki.php.net/phpng#known_problems

Thanks. Dmitry.


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Lior Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Anatol,
>
> It seems you've done some changes to the date extension recently, could
> you take a look at these two failures.
>
> Dmitry - FYI in case it's phpng related.
>
> Bug #67118 crashes in DateTime when this used after failed __construct [ext/date/tests/bug67118.phpt]
>
> Regression introduce in fix for Bug #67118 - Invalid code [ext/date/tests/bug67118_2.phpt]
>
>
> Kaplan
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.