Re: [PHP-DEV] Kill ereg with fire
[email protected] (Chris Wright)
| Newsgroups | php.internals |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGAGxbbd+jG9p-byEb-Vup2HSLh1HyY4x2dyhBP3RNh9MrpatA@mail.gmail.com> |
I have on occasion come across code that uses split(), more often than not as if it were explode() with a literal delimiter. If ereg is to be removed (for which I am +1) does anyone have any objections to making split() into an alias of explode()? This would also be consistent with the join() -> implode() alias. Ps. Sorry for top reply, my phone doesn't seem to want to play nice with an in line response. On 31 Aug 2014 17:29, "Levi Morrison" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote: > > Heck... No :) > > > > Or we mark it as dead right away, single release for the sake of it and > let > > it die. > > I think a single, unmaintained release of ext/ereg in PECL would be > acceptable, but I don't really see the point of that either. If you > still rely on ereg you probably can't upgrade from an earlier version > of PHP so you'll end up using an old release which already has ereg. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >