Re: [PHP-LANG] PHP/FI 2 legacy

[email protected] (Andi Gutmans)
Newsgroups php.lang
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 10:20 27/11/00 -0600, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > old_function() shouldn't be part of the language standard IMO.
> > I can't think of any other things, but we will probably come up with some
> > when we get into the more semantic descriptions. We might want to drop
> > $array[] support and $string[n] for string indexing (using $string{n}
> > instead although I still haven't implemented it).
>
>Why do you want to drop $array[]?

I guess it's OK :)


>I think $string{n} feature works, I've been using it lately.

It works but it acts exactly the way $string[n] works for now. What I will 
want is for {} to be ONLY string specific and [] only array specific. The 
first needs a patch from me and the second is an incompatibility so I doubt 
we'll be changing this very soon.
So the result will be that $string{n} will convert $string to a string and 
then always treat it as a string *even* if it's an array. It's the right 
way to separate these.
If I didn't explain it well let me know.
Andi
---
Andi Gutmans <[email protected]>
http://www.zend.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.