note 102522 added to features.persistent-connections
[email protected] Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:07:15 -0800
| Newsgroups | php.notes |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've been looking everywhere for a benchmark or at least comparison of the overhead used by oci_connect and oci_pconnect. Just saying "oci_connect is slower because the overhead..." is not enough for me. For than I wrote a couple scripts to compare perfomance. At the end I found out an average of 34% more time using a oci_connect than oci_pconnect, using a query of 50 rows and 100 columns. Obviously this wasn't a real benchmark however it gives a simple idea of the efficiency of each function. ---- Server IP: 69.147.83.197 Probable Submitter: 186.4.0.42 ---- Manual Page -- http://www.php.net/manual/en/features.persistent-connections.php Edit -- https://master.php.net/note/edit/102522 Del: integrated -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/integrated Del: useless -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/useless Del: bad code -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/bad+code Del: spam -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/spam Del: non-english -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/non-english Del: in docs -- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522/in+docs Del: other reasons-- https://master.php.net/note/delete/102522 Reject -- https://master.php.net/note/reject/102522 Search -- https://master.php.net/manage/user-notes.php