Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

[email protected] (Jani Taskinen)
Newsgroups php.internals,php.pdo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Pierre, since you choose to ignore the mails I sent to your "secret" address,
I'm taking this to the list, maybe this will be noticed: Pay what you owe me!

--Jani


Pierre Joye kirjoitti:
> Hi,
> 
> On Feb 2, 2008 12:15 PM, Richard Quadling <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If there is no CLA, will that mean we will not get the PDO 2 drivers
>> we need to be able to communicate with the databases?
> 
> It would be really nice if the pro CLA camp stops to condition the
> existence of PDO (or its future) to the CLA acceptation. That's simply
> wrong. Oracle, IBM and MySql (which states their point already, they
> will accept the choice made by the php project) contribute already to
> php.
> 
> The question is actually:
> 
> Can they continue to ignore PHP or do they have to have their
> respective products working smoothly with PHP?
> 
> The answer is pretty obvious and we see announces on a regular basis
> to proove they have to support PHP. Read the respective interviews or
> stories about PHP, the tone is completely different now than a year
> ago.
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.