Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

Hello Pierre,

  amen!, You're noted as no. But other people see a reason and continue to
discuss *please* without you. We will take your vote in as no when it comes
to voting if ever. If you are interested in explanations then I suggest you
read all mails and blogs again until you understand the reason why some
peole need a CLA.

marcus

Saturday, February 2, 2008, 9:33:13 PM, you wrote:

> Hi,

> On Feb 2, 2008 8:52 PM, Steph Fox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >  all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and
>> > a
>> > CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
>> > as
>> > much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.

> There is no place for CLA in pecl either. I still see zero reason to
> tolerate CLA in pecl.php.net or anywhere else.

>> I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and also
>> would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process
>> decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module
>> wouldn't be an acceptable option for some.

> It is not OK for me (to list one). The last attempt to create this
> exact solution (flag in pecl with automatic download of pdf to sign
> etc.) was sadly a failure. As it begins well, the communication
> between the company and us was not good at all and it was not possible
> to get answers in a reasonable time or simply no answer at all. Wez
> was also involved and was the initial contact between the company and
> php.

> -- 
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org




Best regards,
 Marcus