Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

Personally I do a full pecl checkout alongside my php-src checkout, every 
time. The problems with that tend to come out during the build.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcus Boerger" <[email protected]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "internals" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2


> Hello Steph,
>
>  you would not checkout php-default. That would only be used for release
> management. Instead you would checkout php-src and whatever pecl modules 
> you
> wanted, just as you do today. And that includes that you can choose 
> whether
> you like CLA modules or not. Just as today you do not get all PECL 
> modules.
>
> marcus
>
> Saturday, February 2, 2008, 8:52:44 PM, you wrote:
>
>>>  all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field 
>>> and
>>> a
>>> CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
>>> as
>>> much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.
>
>> Hm but then when you checked out you'd have CLA'd stuff as well as normal
>> PECL stuff, as now. Don't you find you automatically tend to fix things 
>> if
>> they're broken? I know I do... even if I rarely get around to posting 
>> those
>> fixes (because once everything works here I go on to the stuff I wanted 
>> to
>> do and forget there was even a problem, until the next time.)
>
>> I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and 
>> also
>> would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process
>> decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module
>> wouldn't be an acceptable option for some.
>
>> - Steph
>
>>> marcus
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>