Re: [PDO] Re: An Idea for PDO 2
[email protected] ("Steph Fox")
| Newsgroups | php.internals,php.pdo |
|---|---|
| Organization | Zend Technologies |
| Message-ID | <00df01c86697$90b90ac0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> |
Moin Lukas, >> Now, PECL has a couple of CLA'd modules already. I don't like them being >> there, and you have stated your own opinion loud and clear. I think we >> should be looking for some way to separate out CLA'd PECL modules to >> elsewhere but leave the PECL structure in place for those modules. It's >> important to offer at least that much, because as long as the licensing >> is sound, CLA'd or not CLA'd doesn't impact end users - just >> contributors. > > Well thanks to a separate PEAR channel, we have all the infrastructure > easily setup to have a different place for users to pick up the code. Or > are you more concerned about the CVS, than the distribution of the > packages? Eh? No, I'm concerned about binaries in the Windows version. We just don't have a working pecl install option. If anyone wants CVS they can use cvs or tortoisecvs or whatever, but that's irrelevant to users... > Why copy to PECL in this case? Shouldnt it just be part of the PHP > distribution QA process? Nobody liked my original PECLA idea (separate CVS module for CLA'd stuff but all PECL resources shared), so I'm trying to give it a different angle :) I preferred the first version tho'. - Steph