Re: [PDO] Re: An Idea for PDO 2

[email protected] ("Steph Fox")
Newsgroups php.internals,php.pdo
Organization Zend Technologies
Message-ID <00df01c86697$90b90ac0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
Moin Lukas,

>> Now, PECL has a couple of CLA'd modules already. I don't like them  being 
>> there, and you have stated your own opinion loud and clear. I  think we 
>> should be looking for some way to separate out CLA'd PECL  modules to 
>> elsewhere but leave the PECL structure in place for those  modules. It's 
>> important to offer at least that much, because as long  as the licensing 
>> is sound, CLA'd or not CLA'd doesn't impact end  users - just 
>> contributors.
>
> Well thanks to a separate PEAR channel, we have all the infrastructure 
> easily setup to have a different place for users to pick up the code.  Or 
> are you more concerned about the CVS, than the distribution of the 
> packages?

Eh? No, I'm concerned about binaries in the Windows version. We just don't 
have a working pecl install option. If anyone wants CVS they can use cvs or 
tortoisecvs or whatever, but that's irrelevant to users...

> Why copy to PECL in this case? Shouldnt it just be part of the PHP 
> distribution QA process?

Nobody liked my original PECLA idea (separate CVS module for CLA'd stuff but 
all PECL resources shared), so I'm trying to give it a different angle :) I 
preferred the first version tho'.

- Steph
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.