Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

chris#@codewarehouse.NET (chris#)
Newsgroups php.internals,php.pdo
Message-ID <[email protected]>


On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:11:54 +0100, "Pierre Joye" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Globally -1. I'm against any CLA in php.net. It was a mistake in the
> first place to accept restricted modules. There is many repositories
> out there, and the companies that need a CLA also have the resources
> to create their own PECL channels. But they may not have the fantastic
> advantages brought by being in php.net, like QA, visibility, etc.
> 
> Secondly it is not correct to mix the topics. PDO will have a future,
> no matter if we accept a CLA or not. The same companies (I would like
> to say, the company) will participate anyway. Their customers need it.
> 
> I think this quote fits well in this thread:
> 
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
> Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
>        -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> 

+1

> --
> Pierre
> http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
> 
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Service provided by hitOmeter.NET internet messaging!
.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.