Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
[email protected] (Christopher Jones)
| Newsgroups | php.internals,php.pdo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Feb 14, 2008 2:48 AM, Christopher Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Pierre Joye wrote: >> > The targets were these/this companies(y) pushing CLA in php.net when >> > it is not necessary to contribute. It has been proven already since >> > months on a nearly daily basis. >> > >> > For example: >> > http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/discuss/msgReader$268 >> >> My understanding is that because of its collaborative nature, >> contributing to PDO V2 has new and very different implications. > > You mean its collaborative and restrictive nature? No - its collaborative nature. > >> Arguments using past contributions to show the ad-hoc development >> model is feasible are (unfortunately) not tenable > > Again, please see my other posts. Since my last post, nothing has been > brought to the list to clarify the situation. Important questions like > who is asking a CLA That has already been stated. This is not an "us and them" situation since each party has different requirements. > who will contribute and what will be brought on board? That has also been stated: expertise and person-power. The fine points will depend on the community, a term that includes data access providers (I'm using that name since not all are actual "vendors"), and the model the community chooses to accept. > Why did they not take contact with us? We did. It just took a very long time. Think of it as a normal "is this idea possible" chat that took place in very, very, very slow motion. Chris -- Christopher Jones, Oracle Email: [email protected] Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/ Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/f8jad