Re: [PDO] PDO2 as a set of PECL extensions, rather than PHP core?

[email protected] ("Dan Scott")
Newsgroups php.pdo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 28/01/2008, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/01/2008, Steph Fox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > > Those non-CLA signing people could even change the code in core, too,
> > > if they felt that it was warranted. They would be contributing to a
> > > derivative work, not to PDO2 itself.
> >
> > That's where the plan falls down. It would be **symlinked**.
>
> But it doesn't have to be symlinked. That's just the way that things
> are done currently, right? Code could just be continually copied and
> merged from the PECL repository into core to maintain the core PDO's
> derived state.
>
> Alternately, PDO could be pulled out of core. When you download and
> install Perl, you don't get DBI - you have to get that separately
> (well, maybe not on Windows, depending on the distributor's
> package...). I'm pretty sure the same is true for Python (as there is
> no core DBI package in Python, just db drivers that implement the DBI
> interface). Does it really matter if PDO is part of the php-src CVS
> directory or not?

Bah. Please forget that last paragraph; I keep forgetting that the
concern is those who dislike a CLA would not be able to participate in
the non-core process (assuming that the non-core approach kept a CLA
of some kind). My bad.

-- 
Dan Scott
Laurentian University
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.