Re: [PDO] PDO2 as a set of PECL extensions, rather than PHP core?
[email protected] ("Dan Scott")
| Newsgroups | php.pdo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28/01/2008, Dan Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28/01/2008, Steph Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > > Those non-CLA signing people could even change the code in core, too, > > > if they felt that it was warranted. They would be contributing to a > > > derivative work, not to PDO2 itself. > > > > That's where the plan falls down. It would be **symlinked**. > > But it doesn't have to be symlinked. That's just the way that things > are done currently, right? Code could just be continually copied and > merged from the PECL repository into core to maintain the core PDO's > derived state. > > Alternately, PDO could be pulled out of core. When you download and > install Perl, you don't get DBI - you have to get that separately > (well, maybe not on Windows, depending on the distributor's > package...). I'm pretty sure the same is true for Python (as there is > no core DBI package in Python, just db drivers that implement the DBI > interface). Does it really matter if PDO is part of the php-src CVS > directory or not? Bah. Please forget that last paragraph; I keep forgetting that the concern is those who dislike a CLA would not be able to participate in the non-core process (assuming that the non-core approach kept a CLA of some kind). My bad. -- Dan Scott Laurentian University