Re: [PDO] PDO transaction isolation level and firebird

Vjacheslav V. Borisov wrote:
> Lester,
> you are right, everyhing is being pushed forward far too fast.
> But may be forward is not so bad. We are using mysql and iterbase
> extensions for years. And now mysql extension is deprecated.
> This forced us to start slowly switching from both of  these extensions to PDO.
> And now I think that PDO is really better that old style extensions
> and some drivers (like mysql) ready for production.
> So I decided to patch PDO firebird extension also. Now both drivers
> working on production sites (new code we are writing with PDO, and
> slowly rewriting old code where applicable)
> P.S. I never heard about php adodb before, so I cannot say anything
> about it. But from my personal point of view it looks like abandoned
> (last modified 2012-09-04)

If you must top post PLEASE don't also quote!
ADOdb is waht SHOULD have been adopted in place of PDO, but PDO is not being 
developed even for mysql! Only the generic drivers are being maintained for any 
of the databases. mysqli is the correct replacement for mysql ( not that I have 
ever used either ;) ) and these are used by most projects who did not switch to 
PDO far too soon. I'm using the generic firebird driver with zenddb rather than 
the PDO one simply becuase it is a better match, and the generic drivers are 
also better for mysql as well.


-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk