Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2

[email protected] (Marcus Boerger)
Newsgroups php.internals,php.pdo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Steph,

  all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and a
CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move as
much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.

marcus

Saturday, February 2, 2008, 6:36:23 PM, you wrote:

>> If we're going the PECL refurbishment route, can we have some way of 
>> marking non-standard (as in CLA'd or differently-licensed) extensions to 
>> make contributors' lives easier and future discussions of this nature 
>> moot? Possibly even a separate CVS module that hooks into the PECL 
>> infrastructure?

> e.g. PECLA ? :)

> This seemed a bad idea to me last night, but actually it could work out well
> (assuming PECL itself is sorted out pronto). From the end user perspective 
> there'd be no distinction between PECL and PECLA extensions - both would 
> have pecl.php.net homepages and releases etc - but from the dev perspective 
> there's this whole marked area that you know you're going to need to sign 
> something if you want to contribute to it, and it would require a separate 
> checkout.

> It also has the advantage that we don't need to wait for PECL to be fixed 
> before opening up the repository module, although obviously how well it 
> works would be down to how well PECL resolves its problems.

> Thoughts, anyone?

> - Steph 




Best regards,
 Marcus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.