Re: [PEAR-DEV] 2.0.0 (Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR 1.9.5 testing)

Fair enough I suppose... Except that Pyrus' dev utilities seem more
sophisticated, but that may be just my experience...


Still... One more even more pressing question... what about PEAR2 packages?
Should they be merged into PEAR, with some adoption of namespaces and such
into the core PEAR standard? Or should pear2.php.net eventually point to
the PEAR installer, instead of Pyrus?


2014-07-15 17:48 GMT+03:00 Christian Weiske <[email protected]>:

> Hello Vasil,
>
>
> >> was wondering what you thought about going 2.0.0-alpha1 and dropping
> >> PHP4 support once and for all.
> >
> > Where does that leave Pyrus?
>
> I don't see a future for Pyrus.
>
> Nobody is working on it, and it is not on-par with the features PEAR
> currently has - as well as a plethora of open bugs I opened years ago.
>
> See https://github.com/pyrus/Pyrus/issues
>
> --
> Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> Christian Weiske
>
> -= Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 =-
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>