Re: [PEAR-DEV] 2.0.0 (Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR 1.9.5 testing)

Hello Vasil,


> > If we release PEAR 1.10 requiring PHP5, then
> > * PHP4 users will not suffer a BC break since they will be unable to
> upgrade to 1.10
> > * PHP5 users will not suffer a BC break since their code will
> > continue to run happily

I didn't consider that. Of course then we can use proper "static"
keywords on PEAR::isError() and a couple of other methods in 1.10.

> OK, then I agree about having PEAR 1.10 instead of PEAR 2.0.0. Pyrus
> is after all itself more or less PEAR 2.0.0 (in fact, Pyrus assumes
> itself supported if a package requires PEAR installer 2.0.0), so
> having PEAR1 with a version 2.0.0 is only breaking and complicating
> things for Pyrus, who's only problem is a lack of people contributing
> to it.

Yep, that's also a point I didn't pay attention to.


So let's make the PHP5 only changes in 1.10.

-- 
Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Christian Weiske

-=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlPFe7kACgkQFMhaCCTq+CNzJgCfWQsoerbqPT8HJwpkqhAmz3kn
d70AniNodmBF4RhotmEgh7qgV3g+PztS
=0T0Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----