Re: cvs: peardoc /en/package/html/html-css api.xml

[email protected] (Mark Wiesemann)
Newsgroups php.pear.doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Laurent Laville wrote:
> Mark Wiesemann a écrit :
>> There are still errors:
>> - the new <sect3> tag in html-css.xml needs a <title> tag
>>   (this removes the first three errors in the current log)
>> - you'll need for every XML file a line like this:
>>   &package.html.html-css.XYZ;
>>   => otherwise the HTML files won't be build and the
>>      references in the <link> tags will be invalid
> 
> Hope this time, all will be fixed.

It's getting better. ;-)

If you'll add the <title> tag to the <sect3> tag, only the following 
errors occur:
$ make test
/usr/bin/onsgmls -i lang-en -s ./phpdocxml.dcl manual.xml
/usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:67:21:X: reference 
to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setoutputgroupsfirst"
/usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:57:21:X: reference 
to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setsinglelineoutput"
/usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:12:27:X: reference 
to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.html-css"
/usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:20:21:X: reference 
to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setxhtmlcompliance"
/usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:47:21:X: reference 
to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setcache"

The references to these files seem to be missing in html-css.xml.

> I understand now why few users write final doc under DocBook format :
> - No way to test under all platform

The current system works under at least Linux, MacOS and Windows (with 
Cygwin). This situation will improve once Hannes Magnusson's great new 
PhD system is ready for peardoc.

> BTW, <title> is not  mandatory on <sect3> tag , but  id  attribute is 
> Then I've  fixed in that way

That might be true, but there is still an error if the <title> tag is 
missing.

> Even If HTML_CSS, seems to be the only effort I'll do to include my doc 
> into PEAR manual,

The "problem" in your case is that you've started with more DocBook 
features. Those developers (like me) that did it only for peardoc had to 
live with the current limitations.

Regards,
Mark

-- 
http://www.markwiesemann.eu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.