Re: cvs: peardoc /en/package/html/html-css api.xml

Mark Wiesemann a écrit :
>
> It's getting better. ;-)
>
> If you'll add the <title> tag to the <sect3> tag, only the following 
> errors occur:
> $ make test
> /usr/bin/onsgmls -i lang-en -s ./phpdocxml.dcl manual.xml
> /usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:67:21:X: reference 
> to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setoutputgroupsfirst"
> /usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:57:21:X: reference 
> to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setsinglelineoutput"
> /usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:12:27:X: reference 
> to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.html-css"
> /usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:20:21:X: reference 
> to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setxhtmlcompliance"
> /usr/bin/onsgmls:./en/package/html/html-css/api.xml:47:21:X: reference 
> to non-existent ID "package.html.html-css.html-css.setcache"
>
> The references to these files seem to be missing in html-css.xml.
>

Thanks to point this to me :o)

>> I understand now why few users write final doc under DocBook format :
>> - No way to test under all platform
>
> The current system works under at least Linux, MacOS and Windows (with 
> Cygwin). This situation will improve once Hannes Magnusson's great new 
> PhD system is ready for peardoc.
>
I hope too, and perharps I will change my point of view in next months. 
But until this event arrive, I won't include HTML_Progress2 standalone 
guide (lot of work to write, and probably lot of work to have a chance 
to include into PEAR manual).
I won't also not include PEAR_PackageFileManager I've wrote One year 
ago. I've gave access to my DocBook sources but nobody did the work !

Probably because lot of work to integrate , again ... and again ;-)

>> BTW, <title> is not  mandatory on <sect3> tag , but  id  attribute is 
>> Then I've  fixed in that way
>
> That might be true, but there is still an error if the <title> tag is 
> missing.
>
I've added into last version !

>> Even If HTML_CSS, seems to be the only effort I'll do to include my 
>> doc into PEAR manual,
>
> The "problem" in your case is that you've started with more DocBook 
> features. Those developers (like me) that did it only for peardoc had 
> to live with the current limitations.
>
Yes, I've did too much when I've begun with DocBook, and now I am 
penalized : my big fault  ;-)

> Regards,
> Mark
>
Laurent