Re: [PEAR-DOC] docbook 5 conversion

Christian Weiske wrote:
> Hello Brett,
> 
> 
>> Once we know what other challenges the 4=>5 conversion has in store,
>> we need to determine the set/book structure we'd like to follow and
>> get at least one small package set up as an example.
> I think we should have a book for each single package. This way we have
> way more methods to integrate and structure documentation, especially
> the books from Laurent (definitive guides) which are already books.

Naive questions:

Won't that complicate building ?

What about the common structure across the documentation ?

Having a book per package means that any package can do as wished but it
also means that if the basic structure (which will probably be used by 
90% of packages changes) changes it will be hell to go over all the 
packages "books" ?

Will phd be happy with that ?

What about having one book for the documentation and create another 
repository for guides/tutorials/you-name-it where people could put whole 
docbooks.

-- 
Arnaud.