cvs: peardoc /en/chapters/rfcs error-handling.xml estrict-compatibility.xml header-comments.xml protected-members.xml qa-team.xml rules-on-rules.xml version-naming.xml

[email protected] ("Christian Weiske")
Newsgroups php.pear.doc
Message-ID <cvscweiske1241460488@cvsserver> 
cweiske		Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009 UTC

  Modified files:              
    /peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs	error-handling.xml 
                             	estrict-compatibility.xml 
                             	header-comments.xml protected-members.xml 
                             	qa-team.xml rules-on-rules.xml 
                             	version-naming.xml 
  Log:
  new wording as suggested by ken
  
  
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml:1.1	Sun May  3 13:21:22 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/error-handling.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -14,9 +14,10 @@
     </abstract>
   </info>
 
-  <para>This RFC has been voted on in PEPr as <link
-  xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;132">proposal
-  #132</link>.</para>
+  <para>
+    This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
+    <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;132">proposal #132</link>.
+  </para>
 
   <section xml:id="chapters.rfcs.error-handling.audience">
     <title>Audience</title>
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml:1.1	Mon May  4 05:31:53 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/estrict-compatibility.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
   </info>
 
   <para>
-   This RFC has been voted on and accepted in PEPr as
+   This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
    <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;419">proposal #419</link>.
   </para>
 
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml:1.1	Sun May  3 16:56:43 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/header-comments.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
     <date>2005-02-02</date>
   </info>
 
-  <para>This RFC has been voted on in PEPr as
+  <para>
+   This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
    <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;128">proposal #128</link>.
   </para>
 
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@
  * @author     Another Author &lt;[email protected]&gt;
  * @copyright  1997-2005 The PHP Group
  * @license    http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt  PHP License 3.0
- * @version    CVS: $Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.1 2009/05/03 16:56:43 cweiske Exp $
+ * @version    CVS: $Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.2 2009/05/04 18:08:08 cweiske Exp $
  * @link       http://pear.php.net/package/PackageName
  * @see        NetOther, Net_Sample::Net_Sample()
  * @since      File available since Release 1.2.0
@@ -256,10 +257,10 @@
       docblocks will use <literal>@package_version@</literal>, which gets
       replaced with the release's version number by the PEAR installer.</para>
 
-      <para>This seems the best compromise because <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.1 2009/05/03 16:56:43 cweiske Exp $</literal>'s
+      <para>This seems the best compromise because <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.2 2009/05/04 18:08:08 cweiske Exp $</literal>'s
       talk about files while the release version numbers talk about the
-      classes. <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.1 2009/05/03 16:56:43 cweiske Exp $</literal> is used rather than
-      <literal>$Revision: 1.1 $</literal> or other shorter tags because it is the
+      classes. <literal>$Id: header-comments.xml,v 1.2 2009/05/04 18:08:08 cweiske Exp $</literal> is used rather than
+      <literal>$Revision: 1.2 $</literal> or other shorter tags because it is the
       standard and provides all of the potentially desired information.</para>
     </section>
 
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml:1.1	Sun May  3 17:44:52 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/protected-members.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
   </info>
 
   <para>
-   This RFC has been voted on in PEPr as
+   This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
    <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;99">proposal #99</link>.
   </para>
 
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml:1.1	Sun May  3 17:24:31 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/qa-team.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -15,8 +15,9 @@
     <date>2004-05-04</date>
   </info>
 
-  <para>This RFC has been voted on in PEPr as <link
-   xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;60">proposal #60</link>.
+  <para>
+   This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
+   <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;60">proposal #60</link>.
   </para>
 
   <section xml:id="chapters.rfcs.qa-team.issues">
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml:1.1 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml:1.2
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml:1.1	Mon May  4 17:42:24 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/rules-on-rules.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
   </info>
 
   <para>
-    This RFC has been voted on and accepted in PEPr as
+    This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
     <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;39">proposal #39</link>.
   </para>
 
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml?r1=1.3&r2=1.4&diff_format=u
Index: peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml
diff -u peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml:1.3 peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml:1.4
--- peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml:1.3	Sun May  3 16:56:43 2009
+++ peardoc/en/chapters/rfcs/version-naming.xml	Mon May  4 18:08:08 2009
@@ -7,8 +7,10 @@
     <title>Version Naming</title>
   </info>
 
-  <para>This RFC has been voted on in PEPr as <link
-  xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;65">proposal #65</link>.</para>
+  <para>
+    This RFC has been ratified in PEPr as
+    <link xlink:href="&url.pear.pepr.proposal;65">proposal #65</link>.
+  </para>
 
   <para>As discussed previously on pear-group, where a full consensus could
   not be reached on the version naming standard, below is the proposed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.