Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-DOC] Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR CS Documentation Incorrect?
[email protected] (Jan Rosier)
| Newsgroups | php.pear.dev,php.pear.doc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
With subversion keyword substitution is "file-based". You can turn it off by removing the svn:keywords property on that file. With no svn:keywords property set on that file, Subversion will do nothing special. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn-book.html#svn.advanced.props.special.keywords Just my 2 cents, Jan Rosier On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Ken Guest wrote: > Chuck > you're proposed solution makes sense - it is an example after-all... > > > k. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Chuck Burgess > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Mark Wiesemann <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hannes Magnusson wrote: >>> >>>> As you can see by the highlighting, that example is b0rked. >>>> I assume the documentor was trying to prevent the $Id$ keyword >>>> being >>>> expanded by SVN. >>>> This _could_ also be a bug in the application rendering the markup >>>> (PhD)... >>>> >>>> Please file this as a documentation bug report :] >>>> >>> >>> The bug report already exists since March: >>> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47679 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark >> >> >> >> I took a look at that PHP bug, as well as looking at both the >> example in >> the >> docs and its source in standards.xml. Since both occurrences are >> examples >> of usage, should it matter if CVS/SVN expands the $Id$ keyword? If >> it >> doesn't, then the example shows you what you should write in your >> @version >> tag... if it does, the example shows what a fully expanded @version >> tag >> looks like. Either/both are reasonable example content, IMO. If >> there are >> no objections to this line of thinking, then I can solve the bug by >> simply >> using "$Id$" in those two instances and commit it. >> >> Thoughts? >> -- >> CRB >> > > > > -- > http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/